TERMINATION OF THE CASE BY THE COURT IN CRIMINAL, ARBITRATION, CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LITIGATION: TRENDS AND ACCIDENTS
- Authors: Sharipova A.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of the Criminal Law and Procedure, Institute of Law, Bashkir State University
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2020)
- Pages: 90-94
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/7927
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2020-6-2-90-94
- ID: 7927
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The novelty of the article is determined by a comparative analysis of the institution of the dismissal of a case by a court in various branches of judicial law. The purpose of this analysis is to identify general trends in the regulation of the grounds and procedure for terminating a criminal case by a court and a court case in arbitration, civil and administrative processes. The task was to determine unreasonable differences between similar norms of procedural branches and to select the best regulatory option. The article uses the methods of system analysis and synthesis, the comparative legal method. As a result of the study, the general legal nature of the plaintiff and the public prosecutor’s refusal from the claims, the death of a participant in the legal proceedings and the existence of a court decision on the same dispute as the grounds for termination of the case by the court, suggesting the same approaches to the regulation of the relevant legal relations in all types of judicial proceedings by the law, is proved. The relationship of a world (reconciliation) agreement and reconciliation with the victim is determined. In conclusion, the ways of improving the criminal procedure institute for terminating a case by a court are named.
About the authors
A. R. Sharipova
Department of the Criminal Law and Procedure, Institute of Law, Bashkir State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Sharipova A. R. Universal'nye protsessual'nye instituty v sudebnom prave [Universal procedural institutions in judicial law]. In: Sudebnaya sistema Respubliki Bashkortostan: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. Sbornik materialov Respublikanskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Ufa, 18 yanvarya 2018 goda) [Judicial system of the Republic of Bashkortostan: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Collection of materials of the Republican
- research and practical conference (Ufa, January 18, ], pp. 85–88 [in Russian].
- Vasilieva E. G. Pravovye i teoreticheskie problemy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya i proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu [Legal and theoretical problems of termination of criminal prosecution and criminal
- proceedings]. Moscow, 2006, p. [in Russian].
- Golovko L. V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom prave [Alternatives to criminal prosecution in modern law]. Saint Petersburg, 2002, 554 p. Available at: https://b-ok.cc/book/3084822/4a4b1d [in Russian].
- Kalnitsky V. V Sostyazatel'noe postroenie sudoproizvodstva ne dolzhno prepyatstvovat' svobodnomu formirovaniyu vnutrennego ubezhdeniya sud'i [Adversarial construction of legal proceedings should not impede the
- free formation of an inner conviction of a judge]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2003, no. 4, pp. 75–[in Russian].
- Mikhailov A. A. Izmenenie prokurorom obvineniya i otkaz prokurora ot obvineniya v sude pervoy instantsii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Change by the prosecutor of prosecution and refusal of the prosecutor of the charges in the court of the first instance: Candidate's of Legal Sciences thesis]. Tomsk, 2008, 266 p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/izmenenie-prokurorom-obvineniya-i-otkaz-prokurora-ot-obvineniya-v-sude-pervoi-instantsii [in Russian].
- Ibragimov I. M. Zashchita prav poterpevshego na raznykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa [Protection of the rights of the victim at different stages of the criminal process]. «Chernye dyry» v Rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve [Black Holes in Russian Legislation], 2008, no. 4, pp. 138–143.
- Gizatullin I. A. Protsessual'nye problemy realizatsii nezavisimosti sudey v sudebnom razbiratel'stve po ugolovnym delam: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Procedural problems of the implementation of the independence of
- judges in criminal trials: Candidate's of Legal Sciences thesis]. Ufa, 2019, pp. 155–Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/protsessualnye-problemy-realizatsii-nezavisimosti-sudei-v-sudebnom-razbiratelstve-po-ugolovn [in Russian].
- Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 13.02.2018 № F01-6533/2017 [Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka District dated 13.02.2018 № F01-6533/2017]. Available at: https://base.garant.ru/39672176/#friends.
- Apellyatsionnoe postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 6 iyulya 2016 g. № 10-10103/16 [Appeal ruling of the Moscow City Court dated July 6, 2016 № 10-10103/16].
- Samitov M. R. Mirovoe soglashenie kak sposob razresheniya grazhdanskogo iska v ugolovnom dele [Amicable agreement as a way to resolve a civil suit in a criminal case]. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Technological University],
- , no. 3, pp. 181–Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mirovoe-soglashenie-kak-sposob-razresheniya-grazhdanskogo-iska-v-ugolovnom-dele (accessed: 24.11.2019).
Supplementary files
