This article analyzes the issue of implementation of deprivation of liberty. The author investigates the issues of the grounds for the appointment of the considered punishment, the correctional value of isolation, law enforcement and security. The relevance of the issue is due to the presence in the Russian criminal and criminal executive legislation of problems regarding to the understanding of the sphere of coercive infl uence of deprivation of liberty, which primarily concerns the private interests of convicts in conditions of deprivation and significant restrictions of rights and freedoms. The paper deals with the issues of differentiated application of regime and educational measures, their content and practical significance, taking into account the combination of forced components, in particular, restrictions on visits, telephone conversations, the purchase of food, receiving parcels, transfers and parcels, and other socially significant interests. The author confirms the hypothesis that the presence of convicts in isolation in a correctional institution provides not only physical elimination from the opportunity to commit a crime, but also creates conditions for ensuring the effectiveness of punishment.

About the authors

T. I. Egorova

Department of Criminal Law, Academy of Law Management of the Federal Penal Service of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Russian Federation


  1. Lasocik Z., Platek M., Rzeplinska I. (eds). Abolitionism in History. On another way on thinking. Warsaw, Institute of Social Prevention and Resocialization, 1991. 200 p. [in English].
  2. Morris R. Crumbling Walls. Why Prisons Fall. New York, Mosaic Press, 1989, 166 p. [in English].
  3. Zharikov Yu. S. Ugolovno-pravovoe regulirovanie i mekhanizm ego realizatsii [Criminal regulation and the mechanism for its implementation]. Moscow, 2009 [in Russian].
  4. Golovastova Yu. A. Osuzhdennyy kak sub"ekt ugolovno-ispolnitel'nykh pravootnosheniy: monografiya [Convicted as a subject of criminal-executive legal relations: monograph]. Ryazan, 2010. Available at: [in Russian].
  5. Pravila vnutrennego rasporyadka ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniy: prikaz Minyusta Rossii [ot 16 dekabrya 2016 g. № 295] [Internal regulations of correctional institutions: order of the Ministry of Justice of Russia [dated December 16, 2016 № 295]]. The offi cial Internet portal of legal information. Available at: (accessed 27.09.2019) [in Russian].
  6. Minimal'nye standartnye pravila obrashcheniya s zaklyuchennymi: prinyaty v g. Zheneve 30.08.1955 [Minimum standard rules for the treatment of prisoners: adopted in Geneva 30.08.1955]. In: Mezhdunar. zashchita prav i svobod cheloveka: sb. dok. [International protection
  7. of human rights and freedoms: collection of documents]. Moscow, 1990, pp. 290–Available at: [in Russian].
  8. Seliverstov V. I. Ispravitel'naya doktrina i ee vliyanie na polozhenie lits, osvobozhdennykh ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya [Correctional doctrine and its impact on the status of an individual exonerated from serving their sentences]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta [Juridical Journal of Samara University], 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–73. DOI: [in Russian].
  9. Andreev N. A. Sotsiologiya ispolneniya ugolovnykh nakazaniy [Sociology of execution of criminal sentences]. Moscow, 2001. [in Russian].
  10. Adoevskaya O. A. O vozmozhnosti i predelakh ucheta mezhdunarodnogo opyta resotsializatsii osuzhdennykh k lisheniyu svobody [On the possibility and limits of taking into account the international experience of the resocialization of prisoners sentenced to the deprivation of liberty]. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta
  11. [Juridical Journal of Samara University], 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–DOI: [in Russian].



Abstract: 554

PDF (Russian): 264



Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Т. И. Егорова

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies