ON THE ISSUE OF DIFFERENTATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR REPEATED CRIMES


Cite item

Abstract

The article deals with problems of differentiation of criminal responsibility depending on the social danger forms of multiple offenses. Conception of differentiation of responsibility is defined. Provisions of the existing criminal legislation are analyzed based on responsibility for the repeated crime and recidivism. The norms of the current legislation, judicial practice, judicial statistics are examined and noticed that the regulation of criminal responsibility in the Criminal Code contradicts to the forms of multiple crimes, and not according to the principles of humanism, justice, and the inevitability of punishment. The conclusion about expediency of a differentiated approach to casual and professional criminals is made. In conclusion, proposals for the reform of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are formulated in order to ensure the optimal differentiation of criminal responsibility, taking into account public danger forms of multiple offenses.

About the authors

D. M. Semenova

Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Svodnye statisticheskie svedeniia o sostoianii sudimosti v Rossii za 2016 god. Sudebnyi departament pri Verkhovnom Sude RF. Dannye sudebnoi statistiki [Summary statistics on the status of criminal record in Russia for 2016. Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Judicial statistics]. Available at: http//www.cdep. ru/index.php?id=79&item=3578 (accessed 16.01.2018) [in Russian].
  2. Statisticheskie svedeniia po pokazateliu «Dolia lits, ranee osuzhdavshikhsia za sovershenie prestuplenii, v obshchem kolichestve lits, osuzhdennykh na osnovanii obvinitelnykh prigovorov, vstupivshikh v zakonnuiu silu» [Statistical information on the indicator «The proportion of persons previously convicted of crimes in the total number of people convicted on the basis of convictions that entered into force» for 2013]. Available at: http: // www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79&item=2356 (accessed 10.10.2017) [in Russian].
  3. Svodnyi otchet o sostave osuzhdennykh, meste soversheniia prestupleniia za 12 mesiatsev 2014 goda [Summary report on the composition of convicts, the crime scene for the period of 12 months of 2014]. Available at: http://usd.sam.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=stat&id=320 (accessed 12.10.2016) [in Russian].
  4. Svodnyi otchet o sostave osuzhdennykh, meste soversheniia prestupleniia za 2015 g. [Summary report on the composition of convicts, the crime scene for 2015]. Available at: http://usd.sam.sudrf.ru/modules. php?name=stat&id=455(accessed 16.01.2018) [in Russian].
  5. Gilinsky Ya. I. Kriminologiia. Teoriia, istoriia, empiricheskaia baza, sotsialnyi kontrol. Kurs lektsii [Criminology. Theory, history, empirical base, social control. Lecture course]. SPb.: Piter, 2002, 384 p. [in Russian].
  6. KlenovaT.V. Rol’Federal’nogo zakona ot 21 noiabria 2003 g. v protivodeistvii mnozhestvennosti prestuplenii [The role of the Federal Law dated November 21, 2003 in counteracting the multiplicity of crimes]. Available at:
  7. http: // sartraccc.ru/i.php?oper=read_file&filename=Pub/
  8. klenova(8-02-htm (accessed 10.01.2017) [in Russian].
  9. Vasilevsky A. V. Differentsiatsiia ugolovnoi otvetstvennostii nakazaniia v Obshchei chasti ugolovnogo prava: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Differentiation of criminal responsibility and punishment in the General Part of Criminal Law: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Yaroslavl, 2000, 220 p. [in Russian].
  10. Kostareva T. A. Differentsiatsiia ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti [Differentiation of criminal responsibility]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 1998, no. 9, pp. 55–56 [in Russian].
  11. Lesnievski-Kostareva T. A. Differentsiatsiia ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti. Teoriia i zakonodatel’naia praktika. 2-e izd., pererab i dop. [Differentiation of criminal responsibility. Theory and legislative practice. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged]. M.: NORMA, 2000, 400 p. [in Russian].
  12. Mel’nikova Yu. B. Differentsiatsiia otvetstvennosti i individualizatsiia nakazaniia [Differentiation of responsibility and individualization of punishment]. Krasnoyarsk: Izdatel’stvo Krasnoiar. un-ta, 1989, 120 p. [in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2018 Д. М. Семенова

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies