ISSUES OF LEGALITY IN THE CONSIDERATION BY THE PROSECUTOR OF THE CRIMINAL CASE RECEIVED WITH AN INDICTMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The indictment, drawn up by the investigator and agreed by the head of the investigative body,
perhaps, is the main procedural document authorities involved in criminal prosecution. This important procedural document contains an output to establish the fact of Commission of crime
by a person subjected to criminal prosecution. This is the conclusion of the investigation based
on collected on the case evidence listed in the indictment. The indictment, in contrast to other
procedural documents of the investigation, shall be made after the investigation is complete, all
installed on the case circumstances and is based on the totality of evidence, revealing in a logical
sequence as the essence of the charges against the accused, and the logic of the process of criminal procedure proof. This role of the indictment in a natural way in the current system of criminal procedure determines and the importance of prosecutorial supervision at the stage of verification of the results of the preliminary investigation and transfer of criminal case for trial on the merits.

About the authors

A. A. Kozyavin

Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Southwest State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

E. A. Makhova

Prosecutor’s office of the Sudzha District of the Kursk Region

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Sheifer S.A. Predvaritel’noe sledstvie. Obshchie usloviia i osnovnye etapy proizvodstva [Preliminary investigation. General conditions and main stages of production]. Kuibyshev, 1986, 184 p. [in Russian].
  2. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Tekst]. Sost. red. Dep. m-va iust. S.G. Shcheglovitov. 3-e izd., ispr., dop. i pererabot [Statute of criminal procedure [Text]. Complier editor at the Department of the Ministry of Justice by S.G. Shcheglovitov. 3rd edition, revised, enlarged and arranged]. Saint-Petersburg: tip. M.M. Stasiulevicha, 1887, [4], 1143 p. [in Russian].
  3. Foinitsky I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Tekst]: V 2-kh t. [Course of criminal proceedings: In 2 Vols.]. SPb.: Al’fa, 1996, Vol. 2, 607 p. [in Russian].
  4. Kozhevnikov O.A. Predmet prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonov pri osushchestvlenii doznaniia i predvaritel’nogo sledstviia [Subject of prosecutorial supervision over execution of laws in the implementation of inquiry and preliminary investigation]. Iuridicheskii vestnik SamGU [Juridical Vestnik of Samara State University], 2015, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–64 [in Russian].
  5. Avetisyan G.A. Podderzhanie i utverzhdenie obvinitel’nogo zakliucheniia prokurorom [Maintenance and approval of the indictment by the Prosecutor]. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2017, no. 8, pp. 57–59 [in Russian].
  6. Burov Yu.V. Funktsiia prokurora na etape okonchaniia predvaritel’nogo sledstviia s sostavleniem obvinitel’nogo zakliucheniia [Function of the Prosecutor at the stage of the preliminary investigation is completed with the preparation of the indictment]. Sudebnaia vlast’ i ugolovnyi protsess [Judicial Authority and Criminal Process], 2017, no. 2, pp. 24–29 [in Russian].
  7. Zharkova A.S. Tipichnye oshibki struktury i soderzhaniia obvinitel’nogo zakliucheniia v praktike sledstvennykh organov [Typical error of the structure and content of the indictment in the practice of investigating authorities]. In the collection: European Scientifi c Conference sbornik statei V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 3 chastiakh [European Scientifi c Conference: collection of articles of V International research and practical conference: in 3 parts], 2017, pp. 342–345 [in Russian].
  8. Golova S.I. Printsip sostiazatel’nosti na etape okonchaniia predvaritel’nogo sledstviia sostavleniem obvinitel’nogo zakliucheniia
  9. [Adversarial principle at the stage of completion of preliminary investigation, drawing up the indictment]. Obshchestvo i pravo [Society and law], 2016, no. 1(, pp. 162–165 [in Russian].
  10. Soloviev S.A. Protsessual’naia tsennost’ obvinitel’nogo zakliucheniia
  11. na so-vremennom etape (prakticheskii aspekt) [Procedural value of the
  12. indictment on the modern stage (practical aspect)]. Advokatskaia praktika [Advocate’s Practice], 2016, no. 1, pp. 28–[in Russian].
  13. Arkhiv prokuratury Rostovskoi oblasti. 2017 g. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu № 2017950 [Elektronnyi resurs] [Archives of the Prosecutor’s office of the Rostov Region. 2017. Supervisory proceedings in criminal case № 2017950 [Electronic resource]]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Accessed: 01.12. 2017 [in Russian].
  14. Golovko L.V. Prekrashchenie dela posle rassledovaniia – takoe zhe tsennoe reshenie, kak raskrytoe prestuplenie s obvinitel’nym zakliucheniem [Termination of the case after the investigation – the
  15. same pricing solution as solved crime with the indictment]. Ugolovnyi
  16. process [Criminal Process], 2016, no. 1(, pp. 20–29 [in Russian].
  17. Tarasov A.I. Deistviia i resheniia prokurora po ugolovnomu delu,
  18. postupivshemu s obvinitel’nym zakliucheniem [Actions and decisions of the Prosecutor on criminal case received with the indictment]. Otechestvennaia iurisprudentsiia [National law], 2016, no. 2(, pp. 21–23 [in Russian].
  19. Arkhiv prokuratury Rostovskoi oblasti. 2016 g. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu № 2016 – 427150 [Elektronnyi
  20. resurs] [Archives of the Prosecutor’s offi ce of the Rostov Region. Supervisory proceedings in criminal case № 2016–427150 [Electronic
  21. resource]]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus».
  22. Accessed: 12. 2017 [in Russian].
  23. Norets A.M. Analiticheskaia rabota prokurora po ugolovnomu
  24. delu, post-upivshemu k nemu s obvinitel’nym zakliucheniem [Analytical work of the Prosecutor on criminal case received with the indictment]. Gumanitarnye, sotsio-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences], 2016, no. 1-2, pp. 109–[in Russian].
  25. Burov Yu.V. Protsessual’naia deiatel’nost’ prokurora po ugolovnomu delu, postupivshemu k nemu s obvinitel’nym zakliucheniem: problemy i puti ikh resheniia [Procedural activities of the Prosecutor in a criminal case received with the indictment: problems and ways of their solution]. Obshchestvennaia bezopasnost’, zakonnost’ i pravoporiadok v III tysiacheletii [Public security, justice and rule of law in the third Millennium], 2015, no. 1-1, pp. 176–184 [in Russian].
  26. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of the Soviet criminal process]. In 2 Vols. Vol. 2. M.: Nauka, 1970, 516 p. [in Russian].
  27. Yakubovich N.A. Okonchanie predvaritel’nogo sledstviia [Completion of the preliminary investigation]. M.: Gosiurizdat, 1962, 147 p. [in Russian].
  28. Kozyavin, A.A. Dosudebnoe i sudebnoe proizvodstva v ugolovnom protsesse i ikh sistemnaia sviaz’ [Pre-trial and trial proceedings in the criminal process and their system relationship]. Vestnik SamGU [Vestnik of Samara State University], 2014, no. 11/2, pp. 180–186 [in Russian].
  29. Arkhiv Leninskogo raionnogo suda g. Kurska [Elektronnyi resurs] [Archive of the Leninsky district court of Kursk [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from: http://lensud.krs.sudrf.ru/ (accessed 01.12.2017) [in Russian].
  30. Kozyavin A.A. Poniatie i sushchnost’ aksiologicheskoi funktsii
  31. ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Concept and essence of the axiological
  32. function of criminal justice]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal
  33. Judicial Proceeding], 2009, no. 1, pp. 4–6[in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 Kozyavin A.A., Makhova E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies