THE PROCESSIONAL, TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL PROBLEMS OF PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION IN CONDITIONS OF WITNESS INVISIBILITY FOR LINEUP AS SECURITY MEASURE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- Authors: Svechnikova E.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 199-205
- Section: Tribune of young scientist
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6073
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2017-3-4-199-205
- ID: 6073
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article deals with the detailed analysis of security measure, used within preliminary
investigation relation to a witness – the presentation for personal identification in conditions of
witness invisibility for lineup, according to article 193 part 8 of Russian Criminal Procedure Code
(CPC of RF). The author points out the common statements connected with the presentation for identification such as purpose, aims, evidential value; compares the rules of identification procedure in ordinary mode and in conditions of witness invisibility for lineup. The results of
following research are based on statistical data, scientific summaries, legal positions of high
courts and materials of investigative activity. The author reveals multiple problems (processional,
technical and tactical) of personal identification in conditions of witness invisibility for lineup
which impede effective witness protection. The findings of represented research are anchored
on leading scientists’ opinions and investigators’ experience as soon as modern achievements of
criminal process. In conclusion the author suggests the optimal solutions of indicated problems,
the means to replenish some omissions in the legislation, the ways to improve efficacy of the
security measures system in common.
About the authors
E. I. Svechnikova
Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Enikeev M.I., Obraztsov V.А., Eminov V.E. Sledstvennye dejstviya: psikhologiya, taktika, tekhnologiya: uchebnoe posobie [Investigative actions: psychology, tactics, technology: tutorial]. M.: Prospekt, 2011. 216 p. [in Russian].
- Bartenev E.A. Takticheskie osobennosti pred"yavleniya dlya opoznaniya s tochki zreniya riska i zashhity dokazatel'stvennoj informatsii [Tactical features presented for identifi cation in terms of risk and protection evidentiary information]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo [Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: Law], 2014, Vol. 10, no 1, pp. 78–83 [in Russian].
- Smushkin А.B. Pred"yavlenie dlya opoznaniya v usloviyakh,
- isklyuchayushhikh vospriyatie opoznayushhego opoznavaemym, kak sposob obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Submission for identifi cation in conditions excluding perception of the identifi er by the identifi ed as a means of ensuring security of the participant of criminal judicial proceeding]. Rossijskij sledovatel' [Russian investigator], 2013, no 15, pp. 11–[in Russian].
- Lazareva V.A., Popov D.V. Problemy ispol'zovaniya svidetel'skix pokazanij v ugolovnom processe [Problems of usage of witness testimony in the criminal procedure]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2009, 166 p. [in Russian].
- Buryka D.А. Pravovye, organizatsionnye i takticheskie osnovy pred"yavleniya dlya opoznaniya: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk [Legal, organizational and tactical basis of presentation for identifi cation: Doctoral thesis]. M, 2005, 235 p. [in Russian].
- Samolaeva E.Yu. Obespechenie doznavatelyami organov vnutrennikh del mer bezopasnosti, predusmotrennykh pri proizvodstve pred"yavleniya dlya opoznaniya [Ensuring the safety of the victim and of the witness at a presentation for identification in the production of investigation]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Moscow institute of MIA], 2013, no 2, pp. 55–58 [in Russian].
- Brusnitsyn L.V. Primenenie norm UPK RF, obespechivayushhikh bezopasnost' uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: nauch.- praktich. posobie. [Application of legal norms of Russian Criminal Procedure Code (CPC of RF) providing security of crime procedure participants: tutorial]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013, 152 p. [in Russian].
- Ugolovnoe delo № 1-236/2011 [Criminal case No 1-236/2011].
- Retrieved from: https://rospravosudie.com/court-kinelskij-rajonnyjsud-
- samarskaya-oblast-s/act-457954810/ [in Russian].
- Shejfer S.А. Sledstvennye dejstviya. Osnovaniya, protsessual'nyj
- poryadok i dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie: monografiya [Investigative
- actions. Basis, procedure and evidential value: monograph]. Samara:
- Samar. gumanit. akad., 2008, p. [in Russian].
- Federal'nyj zakon ot 20.08.2004 № 119-FZ (red. ot 07.02.2017) «O gosudarstvennoj zashhite poterpevshix, svidetelej i inyx uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva» [Federal Law of 20.08.2004 № 119-FL (in edition of 07.02.2017) “Law of victims’, witnesses’ and the other criminal procedure participants’ state protection]. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF [Russian Legislative Corpus], 23.08.2004, no 34, art. 3534 [in Russian].
- Voronov D. Kharakteristika ugrozy postkriminal'nogo vozdejstviya kak osnovaniya dlya primeneniya mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa [Characterizing a threat of post-criminal impact as a ground to apply security measures in relation to participants of criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal law], 2013, no 4, pp. 77–83 [in Russian].
- Brusnitsyn L.V. Obespechenie bezopasnosti lits, sodejstvuyushhikh ugolovnomu pravosudiyu: mirovoj opyt i razvitie rossijskogo zakonodatel'stva (protsessual'noe issledovanie):monografiya [Providing of security in relation to persons who assist criminal justice: worldwide experience and development of Russian legislation (processional research): monograph]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2010, 464 p. [in Russian].
- Samolaeva E.Yu. Teoriya i praktika pred"yavleniya dlya opoznaniya lyudej: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Theory and practice of presentation for personal identifi cation: Doctoral thesis]. M., 2004, 205 p. [in Russian].
- Novikova M.V. Institut bezopasnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve i puti ego sovershenstvovaniya [Institution of security in criminal procedure and the ways of its improving]. Rossijskij sud'ya [Russian Judge], 2007, no 7, pp. 38–41 [in Russian]
- Vlasenko N., Ivanov А. Opoznanie v usloviyakh, isklyuchayushhikh vizual'noe nablyudenie [Identifi cation in conditions of invisibility for lineup]. Zakonnost' [Legality], 2003, no. 6, pp. 22-23 [in Russian].
- Ilyin N.N. Pred"yavlenie litsa dlya opoznaniya po videoizobrajeniyam: takticheskie osobennosti. [Tactical features of carrying out presentation of the person for the identifi cation according to video images]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of Voronezh institute of MIA], 2013, no 2, pp. 75–81 [in Russian].
- Belkin А.R. Nekotorye aspekty proizvodstva opoznaniya na
- predvaritel'nom sledstvii [Some aspects of presentation for identification
- within preliminary investigation]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Criminal Procedure], 2012, no 1, pp. 26–[in Russian].
- Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 18.12.2008 № 1090-O-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Orlova Dmitriya Igorevicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyx prav polozheniem chasti vos'moj stat'yu 193 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii» [Russian Constitutional Court Act of 18.12.2008 № 1090-O-O “Of refusal to accept for settlement of citizen’s Orlov Dmitrii Igorevich complaint about violation of his constitutional rights by the article 193, part 8 of Russian Criminal Procedure Code”]. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus»
- [information system “ConsultantPlus”].
Supplementary files
