The human dimension of technology in philosophy and literature: P. Florensky, F. Dessauer, A. Platonov

Cite item


The aim of the research is to determine the characteristics of the connection between the technical and the anthropological in the philosophical concepts of P. Florensky, F. Dessauer and in the literary activity of A. Platonov. The question of the human dimension of technology is essential today, it is associated with the discussion about the genesis of technology, its role in society, the prospects for the human civilization development and the need to regulate technological progress.
The use of the comparative method allows to focus on the specifics of understanding the issue of the relationship between human being and technology in the works of P. Florensky, F. Dessauer and A. Platonov, as well as to consider the differences between the repercussions of the topic “technology and human being” in philosophy and literature. The Russian religious philosopher P. Florensky expanded the understanding of the “technology” essence up to the space of culture and the achievement of harmony set by God and lost by man. The connection between the genesis of technology and the capacity of Being to coming into being is determined by the works of the German philosopher and theologian F. Dessauer. In science fiction stories and short novels by A. Platonov and, in general, in his early works there may be viewed the fascination with the human mind and the scientific invention generated by it. However, there are also doubts concerning the possibility of the projects’ implementation created by the “narrowed consciousness” of a human being: the loneliness of characters-transformers (creators), the tragedy during the projects’ implementation, the discovery of the “innermost” areas of human existence.
It is necessary to address the fundamental problem of relations between the anthropological and the technical in the culture’s system in order to understand the nature of technology, its place in the sphere of culture, and its functions in the sphere of society.

About the authors

Tatiana Bernyukevich

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4471-0381

Dr. phil. habil., Professor

IstinaResearcherID (IRID): 187903429

ELiBRARY.RU AuthorID: 274204

Russian Federation, 26, Yaroslavskoye Shosse (St.), Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation


  1. Bernyukevich, T.V. (2022), The Technical and the Religious: Concepts and Contemporary Social Practices, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, pp. 105–112, DOI:
  2. Nesterov, A.Y. (2022), Cosmos and metacosmos in dessauer’s philosophy of technology: inventing the environment lecture notes in networks and systemsthis link is disabled, 345 LNNS, pp. 22–33.
  3. Bernyukevich, T.V. (2020), Technology in culture: embodiment of the godlike and transformation of the natural (Fedorov N.F., Florenskiy P.A., Dessauer F.), Postgraduate Bulletin of Povolzhye, no. 7–8, pp. 31–36.
  4. Dessauer, F. (2017), A dispute over technology, monograph, translated from German by A.Yu. Nesterov, Samara Humanitarian Academy Publishing Academy, Samara, Russia.
  5. Kantor, K.M. (1989), It is a shame to live without truth. Andrey Platonov – writer and philosopher: discussion materials, Philosophy Issues, no. 3, pp. 14–21.
  6. Kapp, E., Noiré, L., Espinas, A.V., Cunow, H. (1925), Philosophy of a machine. The role of tool in the development of a human being, Priboy Publishing House, Leningrad.
  7. Kornienko, N.V. (2001), “… I have spent a life”: The principal life and creative activities dates of Platonov A.P. Andrey Platonovich Platonov, Life and Creative Activities: Bibliographical Reference, Pashkov Publishing House, Moscow, Russia, [Online], available at: (Accessed 10 Oct 2021).
  8. Nesterov, A.Yu. (2021), Semiotics as methodology and ontology, Semioticheskie issledovanija. Semiotic studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–13, DOI:
  9. Nesterov, A.Yu. (2016), Epistemological and ontological problems of the philosophy of technology: “The fourth czardom” of F. Dessauer, Ontology of Design, no. 3 (21), pp. 377–389.
  10. Platonov, A. (1983), Platonov А. In a beautiful and violent world. Andrey Platonov. Selected works, Mysl’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  11. Platonov, A. (1983), Sacred person. Andrey Platonov. Selected works, Mysl’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  12. Platonov, A. (1983), Ethereal route. Andrey Platonov. Selected works, Mysl’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  13. Polovinkin, S.M. (2015), Christian personalism of the priest, Pavel Florensky, Moscow, Moscow, Russia.
  14. Semenova, S.G. (1990), Fedorov Nikolay. The art of life, Sovremennyiy Pisatel’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia, [Online], available at: (Accessed 10 October 2021).
  15. Semenova, S.G. (2020), Feeble-mindedness of the sermon: Metaphysics and poetics of Andrey Platonov. S.G. Semenova, the introduction is created by Gacheva A.V., A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
  16. Fedorov, N.F. (1982), Writings. General editorship: A.V. Gulyga, Introduction article and author’s note created by Semenova S.G., Mysl’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  17. Philosophy and literature: the problems of mutual relations (materials of the “roundtable discussion”) (2009), [Online], available at: (Accessed 10 October 2021).
  18. Florensky, P. (2000), Writings in four volumes, vol. 3 (1), Mysl’ Publishing House, Moscow, Russia.
  19. Cheshev, V.V. (2017), Technological progress in cultural-historical context, Philosophy Issues, no. 12, pp. 64–78.
  20. Yablokov, E.A. (1999), Homo Creator – Homo Faber – Homo Spectator: the “skill” topic in the creative works of Platonov A. and Bulgakov M., vol. 46, Russian Literature, Moscow, Russia, [Online], available at: (Accessed 20 October 2021).

Copyright (c) 2022 Bernyukevich T.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies