DOCTRINE OF THE INVESTIGATIVE JUDGES IS NOT VIABLE (ON THE EXAMPLE OF «DOCTRINAL MODELS OF CRIMINAL ROCEDURE LAW OF EVIDENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION» AND «HYPOTHETICAL SYNTHESIZING MODELS OF THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS» BY A.V. SMIRNOV)
- Authors: Savelyev K.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 2, No 1 (2016)
- Pages: 128-136
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/4983
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2016-2-1-128-136
- ID: 4983
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In the article the comparative analysis of doctrinal model of
criminal and procedural law of the Russian Federation developed
by the representatives of Nizhny Novgorod School of the Criminal
Process under the guidance of professor A.S. Alexandrov and
hypothetic model of preliminary investigation by A.V. Smirnov,
key moments of the Soviet system of proving on criminal cases
are viewed, suggestions on correction of problems are formulated..
About the authors
K. A. Savelyev
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru
References
- Mary Shklyaruk. Traektoriia ugolovnogo dela v ofitsial’noi statistike na primere obobshchennykh
- dannykh pravookhranitel’nykh organov [Trajectory of criminal case in the official statistics on the
- example of summary data of law enforcement agencies]. Retrieved from: http://www.enforce.spb.ru/
- images/Issledovanya/2014/IRL_04_MShklyaruk_Trajectory-of-Criminal-Case [in Russian].
- Doktrinal’naia model’ ugolovno-protsessual’nogo dokazatel’stvennogo prava RF [Doctrinal
- model of criminal procedure law of evidence of the Russian]. Retrieved from: https://yadi.sk/d/
- wCzte-FofwRR[in Russian].
- Doktrinal’naia model’ ugolovno-protsessual’nogo dokazatel’stvennogo prava RF [Doctrinal
- model of criminal procedure law of evidence of the Russian]. Author of the main idea – A.S.
- Alexandrov. Perpetrators: A.S. Alexandrov, N.N. Kovtun, A.S. Grachev [et. al.]. Retrieved from:
- http://www.iuaj.net/node/[in Russian].
- Petrukhin I.L. Sudebnye garantii prav lichnosti (v ugolovnom protsesse) [Judicial guarantees
- of individual rights (in criminal procedure) in Aktual’nye voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’iu v Rossii
- i za rubezhom [Actual problems of fighting crime in Russia and abroad]. M., [in Russian].
- Ganin V.V. Gosudarstvennaia politika v oblasti podgotovki iuridicheskikh kadrov Rossii
- (konets XIX-XX v.) [State policy in the field of training of legal personnel in Russia (end of XIX–
- XX centuries)]. Istoriia i sovremennost’ [History and Present], 2012, no. [in Russian].
- Ganin V.V. Gosudarstvennaia politika v oblasti podgotovki iuridicheskikh kadrov Rossii,
- konets XIX–XX v.: Dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora istoricheskikh nauk [State
- policy in the field of training of legal personnel of Russia, end of the XIX–XX centuries. Doctor’s
- of Historical Sciences thesis]. M., [in Russian].Barabash A.S. Prokuror – sledstvennyi sud’ia
- [Public prosecutor – investigative judge] in Ugolovnaia iustitsiia: sviaz’ vremen [Criminal justice:
- the link of times]. M., [in Russian].
- Smirnov A.V. Rossiiskii ugolovnyi protsess: neobkhodima novaia model’ [Russian criminal
- trial: need of a new model]. Retrieved from: http://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20150122/
- html [in Russian].
- Rezoliutsiia 1 Vsesoiuznogo soveshchaniia sudebno-prokurorskikh rabotnikov [Resolution
- of the all–Union meeting of judicial and procuracy officers]. Sovetskaia iustitsiia [Soviet Justitia],
- , no. 13, p. [in Russian].
- O neobkhodimosti strozhaishego sobliudeniia sudami ugolovno-protsessual’nykh norm:
- postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot iiunia 1934 goda [On necessity of the strictest
- observance by the courts of criminal and procedural rules: decision of the Plenum of the Supreme
- Court of the USSR dated June 7, 1934].
- Strogovich M.S. Izbrannye trudy: garantii prav lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. V 3
- tomakh. T. [Selected works: guarantees of individual rights in criminal proceedings. In 3 Volumes.
- Vol. 2]. M., [in Russian]
- Barabash A.S. Prokuror – sledstvennyi sud’ia [Public prosecutor – investigative judge] in
- Ugolovnaia iustitsiia: sviaz’ vremen [Criminal justice: the link of times]. M., [in Russian].
- Petrukhin I. L. Opravdatel’nyi prigovor i pravo na reabilitatsiiu [Acquittal and the right to
- rehabilitation]. M., [in Russian].
- Danevsky V.P. Nashe predvaritel’noe sledstvie, ego nedostatki i reforma [Our preliminary
- investigation, its shortcomings and reform]. M., [in Russian].
- Golovko L.V. Institut sledstvennykh sudei: amerikanizatsiia putem manipuliatsii [Institute
- of investigative judges: Americanization through manipulation]. Retrieved from: http://rapsinews.ru/
- legislation_publication/20150320/htm [in Russian]
- Golovko L.V. Sledstvennye sud’i ili ocherednoi raund «amerikanizatsii» rossiiskogo
- ugolovnogo protsessa? [Investigating judges or another round of «Americanization» of the Russian
- criminal process?]. Retrieved from: http://www.iuaj.net/node/[in Russian]
Supplementary files
