Juridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta Juridical Journal of Samara UniversityJuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta Juridical Journal of Samara University2542-047X2782-2990Samara National Research University502710.18287/2542-047X-2016-2-3-92-98UnknownVERDICT IN THE ABSENCE OF THE DEFENDANT: TOPICAL ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICEPopovaI. P.morenovsv@ssau.ruLaw institute of Baikal State University060920162392980607201706072017Copyright © 2016, Popova I.P.2016<p>The article analyzes some of the problems of legal regulation</p>
<p>of trials in absentia and the order of determination of the verdict</p>
<p>in absentia. On the basis of legal practice, taking into account the</p>
<p>results of the survey of judges, and current legislation proposals on</p>
<p>improvement of this legal institution are formulated.</p>заочный приговор, судебное разбиратель- ство, участие подсудимого, уголовное судопроизводствоjudgment by default, judicial proceeding, participation of person in trial, criminal proceedings[1. Andreeva O.I. Provedenie sudebnogo razbiratel’stva v otsutstvie podsudimogo: problemy pravoprimeneniia [Conducting a trial in the absence of the defendant: law enforcement problems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2006. No. 292-2, pp. 250–252 [in Russian].][2. Benderskaya E.G. Rassmotrenie ugolovnogo dela v otsutstvie podsudimogo: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Consideration of a criminal case in the absence of the defendant. Candidates of Law thesis]. M., 2010. 221 р. [in Russian].][3. Borodinova T.G. Peresmotr prigovorov, vynesennykh v otsutstvie podsudimogo [Resentence rendered in the absence of the defendant]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Society: politics, economics, law]. 2016. No. 4. P. 80–82 [in Russian].][4. Velikaia E.V. Sobliudenie prava podsudimogo na zashchitu pri rassmotrenii dela v ego otsutstvie [Adherence to the defendant’s right to a defense when considering appeal in his absence]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal Procedure], 2015. No. 1. P. 18–24 [in Russian].][5. Kazakov A. Zaochnoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo ugolovnykh del. Dissert. … kand. iurid. nauk [Trial in absentia of criminal cases. Candidates of Law thesis]. Ekaterinburg, 2009. 280 р. [in Russian].][6. Karjakin E.A. Problematika zaochnogo sudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu [Problematics of in absentia judicial proceedings on a criminal case]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal Procedure]. 2015. No. 6. P. 75–79 [in Russian].][7. Obzor praktiki sudebnoi kollegii po ugolovnym delam Primorskogo kraevogo suda po ugolovnym delam za vtoroe polugodie 2015 g. [Review of the practice of the judicial division for criminal cases of the Primorsky regional court on criminal cases for the period of the second half of 2015]. Retrieved from: http://kraevoy.prm.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=docum_sud&id=554 [in Russian].][8. O primenenii sudami norm ugolovno-protsessual’nogo zakonodatel ’stva , reglamentiruiushchego podgotovku ugolovnogo dela k sudebnomu razbiratel’stvu: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 28 ot 22.12.2009 g. (v red. ot 3 marta 2015 g.) [On the application by the courts of criminal procedural legislation norms governing the preparation of a criminal case for trial: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation № 28 dated 22.12.2009 (as amended on March 3, 2015)]. Biulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2010. No. 2 [in Russian].][9. O praktike primeneniia sudami zakonodatel’stva, obespechivaiushchego pravo na zashchitu v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2015g. № 29 [On the practice of application by the courts of legislation, ensuring the right to defense in criminal proceedings: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 30.06.2015 № 29]. Biulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation]. 2015. No. 9 [in Russian].][10. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF po zaprosam Kurganskogo gorodskogo suda Kurganskoi oblasti o proverke konstitutsionnosti chasti piatoi stat’i 247 Ugolovno-protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 maia 2016 g. № 1002-O [Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation at the request of the City Court of Kurgan of the Kurgan Region on verification of constitutionality of the fifth paragraph of Article 247 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation dated May 12, 2016 № 1002-O]. Retrieved from: http://doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision236395.pdf. [in Russian].]