Juridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta Juridical Journal of Samara UniversityJuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta Juridical Journal of Samara University2542-047X2782-2990Samara National Research University1032910.18287/2542-047X-2022-8-1-21-28Research ArticleAdministrative precedence in the context of a multisectoral understanding of its features in the criminal law of Russia and BelarusKhilyutaV. V.tajna@tut.byYanka Kupala State University of Grodno050620228121280206202202062022Copyright © 2022, Khilyuta V.V.2022<p style="text-align: justify;">The article discusses the understanding of administrative precedence in the criminal law of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. The author raises the problem of understanding the administrative precedence through the prism of the time when the crime was committed and the retroactive effect of the criminal law. The question of the validity of bringing a person to criminal and administrative responsibility in the event of a crime with signs of administrative precedence is also discussed. The author concludes that the administrative precedence is a sign of the subject of the crime, and not of the objective side of the corpus delicti. It is also justified that bringing a person for repeated or repeated offenses to administrative rather than criminal responsibility cannot in the future serve as a repeated basis for the perpetrator to be prosecuted for a set of repeated identical acts. For this reason, no one can be held responsible twice for the same act.</p>административная преюдицияуголовный закондействие уголовного законавремя совершения преступленияправонарушениепреступлениеadministrative precedencecriminal lawoperation of criminal lawtime of commission of crimeoffensecrime[Prigovor suda Tsentral’nogo raiona g. Minska ot 24 noyabrya 2021 g. Ugolovnoe delo № 2-1/415 [Verdict of the Central District Court of Minsk dated November 24, 2021. Criminal case № 2-1/415] [in Russian].][Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Belarus’ ot 23 sentyabrya 2012 g. [Decision of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus as of September 23, 2012]. Retrieved from LRC «Etalon» [in Russian].][Ugolovnyi kodeks Respubliki Belarus’: nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii / pod red. V. M. Khomicha, A. V. Barkova, V. V. Marchuka [Khomich V. M., Barkov A. V., Marchuk V. V. (Eds.) Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus: scientific and practical commentary]. Minsk: NTsPI , 2019, 1000 p. [in Russian].][Pudovochkin Yu. E. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestuplenii s administrativnoi preyuditsiei (sudebnaya praktika) [Problems of characterization of crimes with administrative precedence (judicial practice)]. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2022, 208 p. [in Russian].][Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 24 iyunya 2017 goda № 1410-O «Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Avramenko Vladimira Nikolaevicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav stat’ei 264.1 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as of June 24, 2017 № 1410-O «On refusal to accept the complaint of citizen Avramenko Vladimir Nikolaevich about violation of his constitutional rights by Article 264.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation»]. Available at: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-27062017-n-1410-o/ [in Russian].][Otvety na voprosy, postupivshie iz sudov, po primeneniyu polozhenii stat’i 159.4 v svyazi s postanovleniem Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11 dekabrya 2014 goda №32-P i stat’i 264.1 UK RF. Utverzhdeny Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 31.07.2015 [Answers to the questions received from the courts on the application of the provisions of Article 159.4 in connection with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as of December 11, 2014 № 32-P and Article 264.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 31.07.2015]. Available at: https://www.vsrf.ru/files/15028/ [in Russian].][Khilyuta V. V. Administrativnaya preyuditsiya v strukture sostava prestupleniya [Administrative precedence in the structure of the corpus delicti]. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2021, no. 7 (131), pp. 56–63. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46374431 [in Russian].][Khilyuta V. V. Fenomen administrativnoi preyuditsii v kontekste ponimaniya sushchnosti prestupleniya [Phenomenon of administrative prejudice in the context of understanding the essence of crime]. Aktual’nye problemy gosudarstva i prava [Current Issues of the State and Law], 2021, vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 117–136. DOI: http://doi.org/10.20310/2587-9340-2021-5-17-117-136 [in Russian].][Lobanova L. V., Lepskaya M. Yu. Nekotorye aspekty ispol’zovaniya administrativnoi preyuditsii v ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve [Some aspects of the use of administrative precedence in the criminal legislation]. Yuridicheskaya nauka [Legal Science], 2017, no. 6, pp. 63–69. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32739071 [in Russian].][Bezverkhov A. G. Administrativnaya preyuditsial’nost’ v ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve Rossii: istoki, realii, perspektivy [Administrative precedence in the criminal legislation of Russia: origins, realities, prospects]. Vestnik Samarskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Seriya Pravo, 2011, no. 2, pp. 39–52. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17857972 [in Russian].]