SOME NOTES REGARDING THE CLASSIFICATION OF FORMS OF MULTIPLICITY OF CRIMES


Cite item

Abstract

This study addresses certain aspects related to the differentiation in the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of forms (types) of the multiplicity of crimes. The illusory nature of notions of totality and repetition of criminal intrusions as options that completely exhaust the phenomenon of multiplicity is noted. Clarifi cations are made in some groups of manifestations of the multiplicity of crimes available in the legal literature. The difference between concepts such as «multiplicity related (not related) to a criminal record for a previous crime» and «multiplicity related (not related) to conviction of a previous crime» is emphasized. The correlation of the cumulative sentence with forms of multiplicity of crimes is determined. The meaning of the provision enshrined in the fi rst sub-paragraph of paragraph № 54 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation «On the Practice of Assigning Criminal Sentence by the Courts of the Russian Federation» is revealed. The conditions under which the rules of accumulative sentencing can be applied to crimes having a long continuance, in particular, continuous offences are characterized. A defi nite outline of this paper is given by the author’s analysis of scientifi c approaches to the classifi cation of the forms of the multiplicity of crimes which had been developed by Viktor Pavlovich Malkov.

About the authors

L. V. Lobanova

Department of Criminal Law, Volgograd State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

M. A. Malimonova

Department of Criminal Law, Volgograd State University

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

A. P. Rozhnov

Department of Criminal Law, Volgograd State University

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Bytko Yu. I., Bytko S. Yu. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya: uchebnik [Criminal law of Russia. Parts General and Special: textbook]. Saratov: Izd-vo «Nauchnaya kniga», 2007, 282 p. [in Russian].
  2. Malkov V. P. Mnozhestvennost' prestuplenii: sushchnost', vidy, pravovoe znachenie [Multiplicity of crimes: the nature, types, legal significance]. Kazan: Izd-vo «Taglimat», IEUP, 2006, 140 p. Available at: https://b-ok2.org/book/3002562/72fbea [in Russian].
  3. Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo prava: Kurs lektsii: ucheb. posobie dlya magistrantov yurid. vuzov: v 3 t. Pod red. L. V. Lobanovoi. T. 3 [Topical issues of criminal law: Lecture course: study guide for graduate
  4. students of law schools: in volumes. L. V. Lobanova (Ed.). Vol. 3]. Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU, 2018, 403 p. [in Russian].
  5. Chernenko T. G. Mnozhestvennost' prestuplenii po rossiiskomu ugolovnomu pravu: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Multiplicity of crimes under Russian criminal law: author’s abstract of Doctoral of Law thesis]. Tomsk, 2001, 38 p. [in Russian].
  6. Kruglikov L. L., Basiljevsky A. V. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave [Differentiation of responsibility in criminal law]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2003, 300 p. Available at: http://
  7. bookre.org/reader?fi le=1478332&pg=[in Russian].
  8. Arzamastsev M. V. Ugolovno-pravovye posledstviya sudimosti za prestupleniya, sovershennye v nesovershennoletnem vozraste [Criminal and legal consequences of a criminal record for the crimes made at minor age]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Ugolovnoye Pravo], 2013, no. 3, pp. 9–15. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19156290 [in Russian].
  9. Semenova D. M. Osnovanie i predely differentsiatsii ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v usloviyakh mnozhestvennosti prestuplenii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Basis and limits of differentiation of criminal liability in conditions of a multiplicity of crimes: author’s abstract of Candidate’s
  10. of Legal Sciences thesis]. Samara, 2019, p. Available at: https://ssau.ru/fi les/resources/dis_protection/avtoref_semenova.pdf [in Russian].
  11. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 (red. ot 18.12.2018) «O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiiskoi Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya» [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated December 22, 2015 № 58 (as amended on December 18, 2018) «On the practice of imposing criminal punishment by the courts of the Russian Federation»]. Retrieved from «ConsultantPlus». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_190932/ (accessed: 04.02.2019) [in Russian].
  12. Gontar D., Grebenkin F. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za neispolnenie prigovora suda, resheniya suda ili inogo sudebnogo akta [Criminal liability for failure to execute a sentence, court decision or other judicial act]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2005, no. 3, pp. 24–27 [in Russian].
  13. Rishelyuk A. N. Dlyashchiesya i prodolzhaemye prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Continuous offences in the criminal law: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Kyiv, 1992, 25 p. [in Russian].
  14. Chikin D. S. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya (ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika, problemy kvalifikatsii i zakonodatel'nogo konstruirovaniya): avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Complex single crimes (criminal and legal characteristics, problems of qualification and legislative construction): author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal
  15. Sciences thesis]. Krasnodar, 2013, p. Available at: https://www.dissercat.com/content/slozhnye-edinichnye-prestupleniya-
  16. ugolovno-pravovaya-kharakteristika-problemy-kvalifikatsii-/read [in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2020 Л. В. Лобанова, М. А. Малимонова, А. П. Рожнов

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies