MODERN PROBLEMS OF ESTABLISHMENT SIGNIFICANT FOR THE CRIMINAL CASE OF CIRCUMSTANCES AT THE CONCLUSION OF PRE-TRIAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT


Cite item

Abstract

The development of modern Russian criminal justice goes in the direction of simplification of the order of activity of officials and state bodies. Models are created that exclude or limit the use of traditional methods of obtaining and researching evidence. The pre-trial cooperation agreement is one such innovative model, the application of which is based on exclusive rules of evidence. Their application in practice causes numerous problems in various spheres: from establishing the necessary facts to ensuring the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. Particularly relevant is the resolution of such problems as determining the subject of proof at the conclusion of pretrial agreement on cooperation, verification of the validity of charges brought against the accused, the recovery of certain procedural powers of the court in the study of actual data in special judicial proceedings, etc. Based on the results of scientific research of the outstanding scientist-processualist S. A. Sheyfer, the author formulates his own conclusions and proposals for the resolution of these procedural problems to establish the actual circumstances arising at the conclusion of a pre-trial agreement on cooperation.

About the authors

Ya. V. Loshkobanova

police major, Krasnodar University of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Federal’nyi zakon ot 29 iyunya 2009 g. № 141FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [Federal Law № 141-FZ as of June 29, 2009 «On amendments to the Сriminal Сode of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2009, no. 26, Article 3139. Available at: http://www.consultant. ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_88930/ [in Russian].
  2. Federal’nyi zakon ot 3 iyulya 2016 g. № 322-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosu sovershenstvovaniya poryadka sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve» [Federal Law № 322-FZ as of July 3, 2016 «On amendments being made to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on the improvement of the procedure for the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2016, no. 27 (part II), Article 4255. Available at: https://duma.consultant.ru/ documents/3711494 [in Russian].
  3. Zakonoproekt № 690652-7 «O vnesenii izmenenii v stat’i 314 i 316 Ugolovno-protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii (ob utochnenii osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel’stva po ugolovnomu delu pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred”yavlennym emu obvineniem)» [Draft bill № 690652-7 «On amendments being made to Articles 314 and 316 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (on clarification of special order of trial in a criminal case in agreement of the accused with the charges against him)”]. Available at: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/690652-7 [in Russian].
  4. Sheyfer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya i protsessual’naya forma [Investigative measures and procedure form]. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981, 127 p. [in Russian].
  5. Sheyfer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya. Osnovaniya, protsessual’nyi poryadok i dokazatel’stvennoe znachenie: monografiya [Investigative measures. Grounds, procedural order and evidentiary value: monograph]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2004, 184 p. Available at: http://window.edu.ru/resource/907/46907/files/ssu34. pdf [in Russian].
  6. Sheyfer S. A. Sobranie dokazatel’stv po ugolovnomu delu: problemy zakonodatel’stva, teorii i praktiki: monografiya [Collection of evidence in a criminal case: problems of legislation, theory and practice: monograph]. M.: Norma, 2015, 112 p. Available at: https://znanium. com/bookread2.php?book=492296 [in Russian].
  7. Sheyfer S. A. Dokazatel’stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: monografiya [Evidences and proof in criminal cases: monograph]. M.: Norma, 2008, 240 p. Available at: https://znanium.com/bookread2. php?book=144071&spec=1 [in Russian].
  8. Kaigorodov A. A. Predely ogranicheniya neposredstvennosti pri provedenii sudebnogo razbiratel’stva v osobom poryadke [Limits, restricting directness in the course of a trial in a special order]. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta. Pravo [Tomsk State University Journal of Law], 2013, no. 2(8), pp. 43–47. Available at:
  9. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=[in Russian].
  10. This question in the science of criminal procedure has a sharply debatable character. See, for example: Smirnov A. V. Osobyi poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve [Special procedure for making a judicial decision at the conclusion of a pre-trial cooperation agreement]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal procedure], 2009, no. 10, pp. 5–14 [in Russian].
  11. Ramazanov T. B. Dokazyvanie v osobom poryadke sudebnogo razbiratel’stva pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred”yavlennym emu obvineniem [Proof in a special order of legal proceeding in case of a consent of the defendant with the charge brought to him]. Yuridicheskii vestnik DGU [Legal Bulletin of the DSU], 2017, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 134–139. doi: 10.21779/2224-0421-2017-211-134-139 [in Russian].
  12. Stepanenko D. A., Dneprovskaya M. A. Osobyi poryadok prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred”yavlennym emu obvineniem: ucheb. posob. [Special procedure for making a court decision with the consent of the accused with the indictment against him: textbook]. Irkutsk, 2011, 120 p. Available at: https://www.iuaj.net/node/1037 [in Russian].
  13. Irkutskii raionnyi sud Irkutskoi oblasti. Prigovor № 1-133/2019 ot 27 fevralya 2019 g. po delu № 1-133/2019 [Irkutsk district court of Irkutsk Region. Sentence № 1-133/2019 dd. February 27, 2019 with regard to case № 1-133/2019]. Available at: https:// sudact.ru/regular/doc/Bs74LnScaddw/ [in Russian].
  14. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 noyabrya 2016 g. № 55 «O sudebnom prigovore» [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of November 29, 2016 № 55 «On the verdict»]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus». Available at: https://www.garant.ru/ products/ipo/prime/doc/71451272/ [in Russian].
  15. Kulikov V. Vina propis’yu [Blame in words]. Rossiiskaya gazeta, November 29, 2016. Available at: https://rg.ru/2016/11/29/verhovnyj-sud-rf-zapretil-v-prigovore-kopirovat-obvinenie.html [in Russian].
  16. Vdovtsev P. V. Yavlyaetsya li soglasie obvinyaemogo s pred”yavlennym obvineniem usloviem dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve? [Does an agreement of an accused with brought charges constitute a condition for a pre-trial cooperation agreement?]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2015, no. 2, pp. 108–110. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=23306179 [in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2020 Я. В. Лошкобанова

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies