CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BASES OF PROVIDING OF EQUALITY IN PURCHASING ACTIVITY


Cite item

Abstract

In this article problems of ensuring equality among participants of purchasing activity through the analysis of the operating principles underlain in the legislation on contract system are considered. Law-enforcement and administrative practice of the Samara Region when carrying out the largest purchases is analysed. Need of sharing of positive practice of standardization and a tipologization of the regional catalog of goods, works, services of the Samara Region is revealed and proved. Characteristics of law-enforcement practice on the example of mistakes by drawing up the first and second parts of applications for purchase are allocated and described and also versions of their solution are proposed. Such look will be interesting to experts who directly form procurement documentation. On the basis of the conducted research the author offers filling the gaps in the legislation and applications of uniform approach in interpretation of the legislation in the sphere of purchases by law enforcement officials, regulatory and judicial authorities.

About the authors

A. P. Akopyan

Department of State and Administrative Law, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Efimtseva T. V., Shevlyakova I. M. Nekotorye aspekty zakliucheniia kontraktov na vypolnenie podriadnykh rabot dlia gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh nuzhd po zakonodatel’stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Some aspects of signing of the contracts on performance of contract works for the state and municipal needs by the legislation of the Russian Federation]. Pravo i ekonomika [Law and economy], 2018, no. 9, pp. 9–15 [in Russian].
  2. Federal’nyi zakon «O kontraktnoi sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlia obespecheniia gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh nuzhd» [Federal Law «About Contract System in the Sphere of Purchases of Goods, Works, Services for Ensuring the State and Municipal Needs»]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation], 2013, no. 14, Article 1652 [in Russian].
  3. Opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 06.02.2018 po delu A64-4275/2016 [Definition of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as of 06.02.2018 with regard to case A64-4275/2016] [in Russian].
  4. Reshenie Samarskogo UFAS ot 29.08.2017 po delu № 1-24-6049-17/4 [Decision of the Samara OFAS as of 29.08.2017 with regard to case № 1-24-6049-17/4] [in Russian].
  5. Reshenie FAS Rossii ot 15.02.2018 po delu № 18/44/105/125 [FAS of Russia decision as of 15.02.2018 with regard to case № 18/44/105/125].
  6. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 14 sentiabria 2016 goda po delu № A06-471/2016 [Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga Region district as of September 14, 2016 with regard to case № A06-471/2016] [in Russian].
  7. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 9 fevralia 2018 g. po delu № A56-13375/2017 [Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Northwestern Federal District as of February 9, 2018 with regard to case № A56-13375/2017].
  8. Ivanov G. G., Orlov S. L. Sovremennaia kontraktnaia sistema Rossii (Sfera goszakupok): uchebnoe posobie [Modern contract system of Russia (Sphere of state procurements): education guidance]. M.: ID «FORUM»: INFRA-M, 2016, 144 p. [in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2019 А. П. Акопян

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies