Cite item


In practice there are questions connected with recognition by inadmissible proofs, protocols of identification in connection with abnormality of its carrying out, or incorrectness of fixing of results. The insufficient uregulirovannost the legislator of an order of carrying out identification brings in the subsequent to loss of one of proofs – the protocol of identification inadmissible that affects crime investigation process in general. For ensuring quality of carrying out presentation for identification it is offered to settle more carefully and consistently an order of carrying out this investigative action, to formulate the conditions necessary for its implementation. Need of settlement of an order of carrying out identification of animal and rare objects is proved. The offer on need of settlement of an order of presentation for identification with juvenile children for ensuring their physical and mental protection is proved. The position about a possibility of carrying out repeated identification when carrying out initial identification according to photos of more twelve-year prescription is proved.

About the authors

L. G. Tatyanina

Department of Criminal Procedure and Law-Enforcement Activity, Udmurt State University

Author for correspondence.
Russian Federation


  1. Sheifer S.A. Sledstvennye deistviia. Osnovaniia, protsessual’nyi poriadok i dokazatel’stvennoe znachenie [Investigative actions. Bases, procedural order and evidentiary value]. M.: Iurait, 2013, 476 p. [in Russian].
  2. Ginzburg A.Ya. Opoznanie v sledstvennoi, operativnorozysknoi i ekspertnoi praktike [Identifi cation in investigative, operational search and expert practice]. – M., 1996, 122 p. [in Russian].
  3. Rossinsky S.B. Sledstvennye deistviia: monografi ia [Investigative actions: monograph]. M.: Norma, 2018, 240 p. [in Russian].
  4. Eminov V.E., Ishchevnko E.P. Sledstvennye deistviia – osnova raskrytiia prestuplenii: psikhologo-kriminalisticheskii analiz: prakticheskoe posobie [Investigative actions – basis of disclosure of crimes: psikhological and criminalistic analysis: practical guide]. M.: Norma, 2015, 208 p. [in Russian].
  5. Galyashin N.V. Pokazaniia s «chuzhikh slov» kak proizvodnye dokazatel’stva v ugolovnom protsesse: monografiia [Testoimonies from «others words» as derivative proofs in the criminal procedure: monograph]. M.: OOO «Prospekt», 2017, 176 p. [in Russian].
  6. Zeygarnik B.V. Patologiia myshleniia [Thinking pathology]. M.: Izdatel’stvo MGU, 1962, 244 p. [in Russian].
  7. Kappara D., Servon D. Psikhologiia lichnosti [Psychology of personality]. SPb.: Piter, 2003, 288 p. [in Russian].
  8. Korolenko Ts.P. Psikhofi ziologiia cheloveka v ekstremal’nykh obstoiatel’stvakh [Human psychophysiology in extreme circumstances]. M.: Meditsina, 1978, 258 p. [in Russian].
  9. Psikhologicheskie posledstviia ekstremal’nykh situatsii. Pod red. N.N. Pukovskogo [Psychological consequences of extreme situations. N.N. Pukovsky (Ed.)]. M., 2000, 198 p. [in Russian].
  10. Tatyanin D.V. Nekotorye voprosy provedeniia opoznaniia zhivotnykh (protsessual’nye problemy i puti ikh resheniia) [Some questions of carrying out identifi cation of animals (procedural problems and ways of their solution)]. In: Tatishchevskie chteniia: aktual’nye problemy nauki i praktiki: V Mezhdunarodnaia nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentsiia. V 4 ch. [Tatishchev readings: current problems of science and practice: International research and practical conference. In 4 parts]. Togliatti: Izd-vo VUiD, Part 4, 2008, pp. 112–117 [in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2018 Л. Г. Татьянина

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies