Cite item


This article is dedicated to the methodological problem of ratio of goals and functions of legal phenomena on the example of an institute of legal liability. First of all, author demonstrates the dialectical relationship between the ideas of purpose and function, and also pays attention to the content analysis. Along with that, the carried out research poses several problems in the correlation of purposes and functions of legal liability: the complexity of realization of functions as the foundation of achieving goals of legal liability; possibility of achieving goals of legal liability at partial realization of functions of legal liability, possibility of separation of basic and additional goals of legal liability on the basis of research of system provided implementation of its functions.

About the authors

A. V. Belova

Nayanova University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru


  1. Vinner N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo [Cybernetics and society]. M., 1958, 200 p. [in Russian].
  2. Hachaturov R.L., Lipinskij D.A. Obshchaia teoriia iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [General
  3. theory of legal liability]. SPb, 2007, p. [in Russian].
  4. Vitruk N.V. Obshchaia teoriia iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [General theory of legal liability].
  5. Ì., 2008, p. [in Russian].
  6. Ivanova O.M. O tseliakh iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [About the purposes of legal liability].
  7. Pravo i politika [Law and politics], 2007, no. 11, pp.116–[in Russian].
  8. Lipinskij D.A. Sootnoshenie funktsii prava i funktsii iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [The ratio
  9. of functions of law and functions of legal responsibility]. Pravovedenie, 2004, no. 3, pp. 144–155[in Russian].

Copyright (c) 2017 А. В. Белова

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies