DOCTRINE OF THE INVESTIGATIVE JUDGES IS NOT VIABLE (ON THE EXAMPLE OF «DOCTRINAL MODELS OF CRIMINAL ROCEDURE LAW OF EVIDENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION» AND «HYPOTHETICAL SYNTHESIZING MODELS OF THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS» BY A.V. SMIRNOV)


Cite item

Abstract

In the article the comparative analysis of doctrinal model of

criminal and procedural law of the Russian Federation developed

by the representatives of Nizhny Novgorod School of the Criminal

Process under the guidance of professor A.S. Alexandrov and

hypothetic model of preliminary investigation by A.V. Smirnov,

key moments of the Soviet system of proving on criminal cases

are viewed, suggestions on correction of problems are formulated..

About the authors

K. A. Savelyev

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru

References

  1. Mary Shklyaruk. Traektoriia ugolovnogo dela v ofitsial’noi statistike na primere obobshchennykh
  2. dannykh pravookhranitel’nykh organov [Trajectory of criminal case in the official statistics on the
  3. example of summary data of law enforcement agencies]. Retrieved from: http://www.enforce.spb.ru/
  4. images/Issledovanya/2014/IRL_04_MShklyaruk_Trajectory-of-Criminal-Case [in Russian].
  5. Doktrinal’naia model’ ugolovno-protsessual’nogo dokazatel’stvennogo prava RF [Doctrinal
  6. model of criminal procedure law of evidence of the Russian]. Retrieved from: https://yadi.sk/d/
  7. wCzte-FofwRR[in Russian].
  8. Doktrinal’naia model’ ugolovno-protsessual’nogo dokazatel’stvennogo prava RF [Doctrinal
  9. model of criminal procedure law of evidence of the Russian]. Author of the main idea – A.S.
  10. Alexandrov. Perpetrators: A.S. Alexandrov, N.N. Kovtun, A.S. Grachev [et. al.]. Retrieved from:
  11. http://www.iuaj.net/node/[in Russian].
  12. Petrukhin I.L. Sudebnye garantii prav lichnosti (v ugolovnom protsesse) [Judicial guarantees
  13. of individual rights (in criminal procedure) in Aktual’nye voprosy bor’by s prestupnost’iu v Rossii
  14. i za rubezhom [Actual problems of fighting crime in Russia and abroad]. M., [in Russian].
  15. Ganin V.V. Gosudarstvennaia politika v oblasti podgotovki iuridicheskikh kadrov Rossii
  16. (konets XIX-XX v.) [State policy in the field of training of legal personnel in Russia (end of XIX–
  17. XX centuries)]. Istoriia i sovremennost’ [History and Present], 2012, no. [in Russian].
  18. Ganin V.V. Gosudarstvennaia politika v oblasti podgotovki iuridicheskikh kadrov Rossii,
  19. konets XIX–XX v.: Dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora istoricheskikh nauk [State
  20. policy in the field of training of legal personnel of Russia, end of the XIX–XX centuries. Doctor’s
  21. of Historical Sciences thesis]. M., [in Russian].Barabash A.S. Prokuror – sledstvennyi sud’ia
  22. [Public prosecutor – investigative judge] in Ugolovnaia iustitsiia: sviaz’ vremen [Criminal justice:
  23. the link of times]. M., [in Russian].
  24. Smirnov A.V. Rossiiskii ugolovnyi protsess: neobkhodima novaia model’ [Russian criminal
  25. trial: need of a new model]. Retrieved from: http://rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20150122/
  26. html [in Russian].
  27. Rezoliutsiia 1 Vsesoiuznogo soveshchaniia sudebno-prokurorskikh rabotnikov [Resolution
  28. of the all–Union meeting of judicial and procuracy officers]. Sovetskaia iustitsiia [Soviet Justitia],
  29. , no. 13, p. [in Russian].
  30. O neobkhodimosti strozhaishego sobliudeniia sudami ugolovno-protsessual’nykh norm:
  31. postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda SSSR ot iiunia 1934 goda [On necessity of the strictest
  32. observance by the courts of criminal and procedural rules: decision of the Plenum of the Supreme
  33. Court of the USSR dated June 7, 1934].
  34. Strogovich M.S. Izbrannye trudy: garantii prav lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. V 3
  35. tomakh. T. [Selected works: guarantees of individual rights in criminal proceedings. In 3 Volumes.
  36. Vol. 2]. M., [in Russian]
  37. Barabash A.S. Prokuror – sledstvennyi sud’ia [Public prosecutor – investigative judge] in
  38. Ugolovnaia iustitsiia: sviaz’ vremen [Criminal justice: the link of times]. M., [in Russian].
  39. Petrukhin I. L. Opravdatel’nyi prigovor i pravo na reabilitatsiiu [Acquittal and the right to
  40. rehabilitation]. M., [in Russian].
  41. Danevsky V.P. Nashe predvaritel’noe sledstvie, ego nedostatki i reforma [Our preliminary
  42. investigation, its shortcomings and reform]. M., [in Russian].
  43. Golovko L.V. Institut sledstvennykh sudei: amerikanizatsiia putem manipuliatsii [Institute
  44. of investigative judges: Americanization through manipulation]. Retrieved from: http://rapsinews.ru/
  45. legislation_publication/20150320/htm [in Russian]
  46. Golovko L.V. Sledstvennye sud’i ili ocherednoi raund «amerikanizatsii» rossiiskogo
  47. ugolovnogo protsessa? [Investigating judges or another round of «Americanization» of the Russian
  48. criminal process?]. Retrieved from: http://www.iuaj.net/node/[in Russian]

Copyright (c) 2017 К. А. Савельев

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies