Cite item


The article explores the possibility of rational choice theory

in criminal law and criminology on the example of the Coase

theorem. It is alleged that the criminal law gives rise to considerable

social costs that can be reduced, in particular through better

application of the rules governing criminal reconciliation with the


About the authors

O. N. Bibik

Omsk State University

Author for correspondence.


  1. Coase R. Firma, rynok i pravo [The Firm, the Market, and the Law]. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2007, 224 p. [in Russian].
  2. Posner R.A. An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law. Columbia Law Review, 1985, Vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1193–1231 [in English].
  3. Apelliatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 27.04.2015 po delu №
  4. -6299/[Appelate decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan dated 27.04.
  5. with regard to case № 33-6299/2015]. Legal reference system «Consultant Plus» [in Russian].
  6. Skol’ko stoit zakliuchennyi? [How much is the prisoner?]. Retrieved from:
  7. dontknows/1221856/ (accessed 02.2016) [in Russian].
  8. SE: na zakliuchennogo v RF tratiat v 50 raz men’she, chem v srednem po SE [The Council of
  9. Europe: a prisoner in Russia spends times less than the average for the CE]. Retrieved from:
  10. (accessed 12.02.2016). [In Russian].
  11. FNS vyvela otraslevye pokazateli rentabel’nosti i nalogovoi nagruzki na 2014 god [Federal Tax Service has led the industry profitability and the tax burden for 2014]. Retrieved from: http://
  13. (accessed: 02.2016). [in Russian].
  14. Wessels J., Beulke W. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 35, neubearbeite Auflage. Heidelberg:
  15. C. F. Mьller Verlag, 2005, s. [in German].
  16. Zehr H. Vosstanovitel’noe pravosudie: novyi vzgliad na prestuplenie i nakazanie: Per. s angl. Obshch. red. L.M. Karnozovoi. Komment. L.M. Karnozovoi i S.A. Pashina [Restorative justice: a new perspective on crime and punishment: Transl. from English. L.M. Karnozova (Ed.). Comments by L.M. Karnozova and S.A. Pashin]. M.: MOO Tsentr «Sudebno-pravovaia reforma», 2002.
  17. Retrieved from: 15.02.2016). [in Russian].
  18. Urazbaev R.Sh., Mingalimova M.F. Prekrashchenie ugolovnykh del za primireniem storon po neschastnym sluchaiam na proizvodstve so smertel’nym iskhodom nezakonno [Termination of criminal cases for the reconciliation of the parties for accidents in the workplace fatalities is illegal]. Zakonnost’ [Legality], 2015, no. 9, pp. 64–69 [in Russian].
  19. Tseneva V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v sviazi s primireniem s poterpevshim:
  20. аvtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Exemption from criminal liability in connection with reconciliation with the victim. Author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Law thesis]. Tomsk, 2002, p. [in Russian].
  21. Shnitenkov A.V. Primirenie s poterpevshim kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniia ot ugolovnoi
  22. otvetstvennosti: problemy zakonodatel’stva i sudebnoi praktiki [Reconciliation with the victim as
  23. grounds for exemption from criminal liability: problems of legislation and judicial practice]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia [Russian Justitia], 2014, no. 11, pp. 54–[in Russian].
  24. Friedman D.D. Law’s order: what economics has to do with law and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000, 337 p. [in English].

Copyright (c) 2017 О. Н. Бибик

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies