ON SOME ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE PROCESS OF COMPENSATION TO THE REPRESENTATIVE'S FEES


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article is about the main problems of implementation of judicial discretion in the process of
compensation to the representative's fees. The urgency of the issue is due to the modernization of the civil process in Russia. This article attempts to uncover the essence of the concept of “judicial discretion in the compensation to the representative's fees”, and also presents the main directions of law enforcementpractice on the issue. The author has formed the main proposals for limiting the willful discretion. As a research task, the author identified an attempt to assess the criteria for reasonableness of representational expenses that exist in judicial practice. Proceeding from the received results of scientific work, the author comes to a conclusion that the compensation to the representative's fees by the court should be made taking into account the criteria relating to the essence of the case and the personality of the representative. At the same time the author emphasizes need of more detailed studying of the specified perspective.

About the authors

A. V. Kornilova

Department of Civil Law and Process, The University of Management «TISBI»

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie: ponyatie, osnovaniya, predely: materialy VI Mezhregional'noi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii. Otv. red. O. A. Egorova, Yu. F. Bespalov [Judicial discretion: the concept, grounds, limits: materials of the VI Interregional Research and Practical Conference. O. A. Egorova. Yu. F. Bespalov (Eds.)]. M.: Prospekt, 2015, 256 p. Available at: https://ru.b-ok.cc/book/2718481/c7b662 [in Russian].
  2. Chetvertakova E. S. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie pri opredelenii razumnosti i sorazmernosti sudebnykh izderzhek v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial discretion in determining the reasonableness and proportionality of court costs in the arbitration process]. Sud'ya [Judge], 2016, no. 8, pp. 48–53. Available at: http://xn----7sbbaj7auwnffhk.xn--p1ai/article/22208 [in Russian].
  3. Papkova O. A. Sudebnye dokazatel'stva i usmotrenie suda v grazhdanskom protsesse [Judicial evidence and the discretion of the court in civil process]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2002, no. 2, pp. 30–35. Available at: http://lawlibrary.ru/article1088837.html [in Russian].
  4. Vas’kovskiy E. V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava [Сivil process: textbook]. M.: Statut, 2003, 382 p. Available at: http://civil.consultant.ru/elib/books/24 [in Russian].
  5. Tolkovyi slovar' Ushakova [Elektronnyi resurs] [Ushakov Explanatory Dictionary [Electronic resource]. In: Slovari i entsiklopedii na Akademike: ofitsial'nyi sait [Dictionaries and encyclopaedias on Academic: official website]. Available at: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/1070766 (accessed 29.11.2016) [in Russian].
  6. Barak A. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie. Perevod s angliiskogo. Ch. 1. [Judicial discretion. Translation from English. Part 1]. M.: NORMA, 1999, 376 p. Available at: https://lawbook.online/pravo-sudebnoe/sudeyskoe-usmotrenie-perevod-angliyskogoch1.html [in Russian].
  7. Ermakova K. P. Pravovye predely sudebnogo usmotreniya [Legal framework of judicial discretion]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2010, no. 8 (152), pp. 50–58. Available at: https:// wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/44558-pravovye-predelysudebnogo-usmotreniya [in Russian].
  8. Postanovlenie Devyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 21.10.2016 № 19AP-5629/2016 po delu № A35-10907/2015 [Resolution of the Nineteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal as of 21.10.2016 № 19AP-5629/2016 with regard to case № A35-10907/2015]. Retrieved from legal reference system «Consultant Plus» [in Russian].
  9. Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 9 noyabrya 2012 g. po delu № A65-29543/2010 [Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Tatarstan as of November 9, 2012 with regard to case № A65-29543/2010]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» [in Russian].
  10. Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Respubliki Tatarstan ot 31 oktyabrya 2016 goda po delu № A65-31504/2015 [Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Republic of Tatarstan as of October 31, 2016 with regard to case № A65-31504/2015]. Retrieved from legal reference system «ConsultantPlus».

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Kornilova A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies