ABOUT POSSIBLE ABUSES OF PRE-INVESTIGATION BODIES IN THE PRODUCTION OF SELECTED INVESTIGATIONS
- Authors: Iunoshev S.V.1, Ubasev V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 177-182
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6067
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2017-3-4-177-182
- ID: 6067
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article deals with the possibility of abuse by employees of preliminary investigation bodies in the course of investigative actions. The definitions of abuse of procedural powers are given and the applicability of this concept to actions carried out by the employees of the preliminary investigation bodies is confirmed. Some types of abuse are considered in the manufacture of such investigative actions as interrogation, presentation for identification, search and seizure. The authors propose ways to solve the problem of the abuse of powers by the employees of the preliminary investigation bodies in law enforcement practice, mainly by making appropriate changes to the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, and fixing new procedural safeguards to protect the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. In particular,
the authors propose the introduction in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the rules on compulsory video shooting during the conduct of separate investigative actions, as well as reducing the possibilities for the investigator to make decisions on the conduct of investigative actions, guided solely by their own discretion.
About the authors
S. V. Iunoshev
Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
V. V. Ubasev
Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Samara National Research University
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Sheifer S.A. Sledstvennye deistviia. Sistema i protsessual’naia forma [Investigative actions. System and procedural form]. M.: Iurid. lit., 1981, 128 p. [in Russian].
- Sheifer S.A. Sledstvennye deistviia. Osnovaniia, protsessual’nyi poriadok i dokazatel’stvennoe znachenie [Investigative actions. Grounds, procedural order and evidentiary value]. Samara: «Samarskii universitet», 2004, 228 p. [in Russian].
- Ugolovno-protsessual’noe pravo. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki: uchebnik dlia magistrov. Pod red. V.A. Lazarevoi, A.A. Tarasova [Criminal Procedure Law. Actual problems of theory and practice: textbook for Masters. V.A. Lazareva, A.A. Tarasov (Eds.)]. M.: Izdatel’stvo Iurait, 2014. Series: Master. 476 p. [in Russian].
- Rossinsky S.B. Sledstvennye deistviia: monografiia [Investigative actions: monograph]. M.: Norma, 2018, 240 p. [in Russian].
- Ugolovnyi protsess: uchebnik. Kollektiv avtorov; pod red. V.A. Lazarevoi [Criminal trial: textbook. Team of authors; V.A. Lazareva (Ed.)]. M.: IuSTITsIIa, 2015, 656 p. (Bachelor’s programme and specialist programme) [in Russian].
- Baev O.Ya. «Zloupotreblenie pravom» kak ugolovnoprotsessual’naia
- kategoriia [«Abuse of the law» as a criminal procedure category]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Рravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law], 2013, no. 2(, pp. 336–349 [in Russian].
- Baev O.Ya. Preduprezhdenie zloupotreblenii sledovatelia v prave na proizvodstvo sledstvennykh deistvii (na primere doprosa i ochnoi stavki) [Prevention of abuse of an investigator in the right to conduct investigative actions (on the example of interrogation and confrontation)]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: pravo [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law], 2014, no. 2, pp. 185–195 [in Russian].
- Mazunin Ya.M. O sushchnosti pred»iavleniia dlia opoznaniia [On the essence of presentation for identifi cation]. Innovatsionnoe obrazovanie i ekonomika [Innovative education and economics], 2012, Vol. 1, no. 11(22), pp. 34–48 [in Russian].
- Vardanyan A.V. Obysk i problemy uchastiia poniatykh v ego proizvodstve [Search and problems of participation of witnesses in its production]. Obshchestvo i pravo [Society and Law], 2008, no. 2, pp. 212–214 [in Russian].
- Drobinin D.V. K voprosu ob osnovaniiakh razgranicheniia obyska i vyemki kak samostoiatel’nykh sledstvennykh deistvii [On the issue of the grounds for distinguishing between search and seizure as independent investigative actions]. Iuridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo universiteta [Juridical Journal of Samara University], 2017, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75–79 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
