ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF UNDERSTANDING THE EXCESSIVE ACT OF AN ACCOMPLICE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article deals with some issues related to the understanding of the excesses of accomplices and the definition of the criminal – legal consequences of crimes committed in the appropriate conditions. The current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation establishes a definitive rule on the excessive behavior of the perpetrator of the crime, but does not regulate the criminal liability of this accomplice in the excesses, as well as the responsibility of other accomplices in the crime. In this case, the excess of accomplices who are not co-perpetrators of the crime is not unreasonably taken into account. This explains the choice of the purpose of the study – to determine the initial ideas of understanding the incident, not only the performer, but also other accomplices of the crime. Objectives of the article: to confirm the possibility of excesses of an accomplice who is not the perpetrator of the crime, to identify the limits of excesses of accomplices, to develop recommendations for improving the current legislation in this area of legal regulation, to formulate rules for the qualification of crimes in the conditions of excesses of accomplices. The main conclusions of the authors of the article – on the understanding of the excesses of the accomplice without deviation from the conceptual ideas of the doctrine of complicity, the universality of the rules of the excesses and the need to differentiate the responsibility of the accomplices in the excesses of any of the accomplices.

About the authors

T. V. Klenova

Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

D. L. Mnatsakanyan

Samara National Research University

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Klenova T. V. Vozmozhnosti Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii v preodolenii nedostatkov ugolovnogo zakona [Possibilities of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in overcoming the shortcomings of the Criminal Law]. In: Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnopraktich. konf.i 29–30 yanvarya 2004 g. [Criminal Law: development strategy in the XXI century: Proceedings of the international research and practical conference on January 29–30, 2004]. M.: MGYuA, 2004, pp. 58–63 [in Russian].
  2. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 1999, no. 3 [in Russian].
  3. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2003, no. 7 [in Russian].
  4. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2003, no. 2 [in Russian].
  5. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2003, no. 3 [in Russian].
  6. Galiakbarov R. R. Bor’ba s gruppovymi prestupleniyami. Voprosy kvalifikatsii [Fight against group crimes. Issues of qualification]. Krasnodar: Kubanskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet, 2000, 200 p. Available at: https://www.studmed.ru/view/galiakbarovrr-kvalifikaciya-gruppovyh-prestupleniy_e99c35011e3. html [in Russian].
  7. Ivanov N. G. Souchastie v pravoprimenitel’noi praktike i v doktrine ugolovnogo prava [Complicity in law enforcement practice and in the doctrine of criminal law]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2006, no. 6, pp. 29–32. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12951174 [in Russian].
  8. Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (nauchno-prakticheskii). Pod red. A. I. Chuchaeva [Comments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (research and practical). A. I. Chuchaev (Ed.)]. M.: Prospekt, 2019, 1536 p. [in Russian].
  9. Telnov P. F. Kto otvechaet za souchastie v prestuplenii. Otv. red. A. Ya. Sukharev [Who is responsible for complicity in the crime. A. Ya. Sukharev (Ed.)]. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981, 96 p. [in Russian].
  10. Kosareva T. I. Posobnichestvo soversheniyu prestupleniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Aiding the commission of a crime: Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Ryazan, 2004, 194 p. Available at: http://www. dslib.net/kriminal-pravo/posobnichestvo-soversheniju-prestuplenija.html [in Russian].
  11. Milyukov S. F. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel’stvo: opyt kriticheskogo analiza [Criminal law: experience of critical analysis]. SPb.: Znanie, SPbIVESEP, 2000, 279 p. Available at: http://www.adhdportal.com/book_1721.html [in Russian].
  12. Byulleten’ Verkhovnogo Suda RF [Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation], 2017, no. 8 [in Russian].
  13. Kapinus O. S., Obrazhiyev K. V. Ekstsess ispolnitelya i inykh souchastnikov prestupleniya: problemy kvalifikatsii [An excessive act of a perpetrator and other partners in crime: problems of qualification]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2018, no. 2, pp. 42–51. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34968304 [in Russian].
  14. Arutyunov A. A. Souchastie v prestuplenii [Crimnal complicity]. M.: Statut, 2013, 408 p. Availabl at: https://ru.b-ok.cc/book/2902721/bc9dcc [in Russian].
  15. Ivanova L. V. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii deistvii souchastnikov pri ekstsesse ispolnitelya prestupleniya [Peculiarities of qualification of actions of accomplices in case of an excessive act]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ [Russian Investigator], 2013, no. 7, pp. 24–26. Available at: https:// elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19080165 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Klenova T.V., Mnatsakanyan D.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies