REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSENT TO CONDUCT RESEARCH, TREATMENT OR DIAGNOSTICS IN THE AREA OF HUMAN GENOME


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is about the attribute characteristics of consent to conduct research (treatment, diagnosis) in the field of the human genome, enshrined in international and domestic legal acts, while revealing the autonomy and interrelation of relevant features. Considering that the collection of genetic information can be carried out in order to provide medical care and be accompanied by medical intervention, increased attention is paid to legal indications of consent to such an intervention (information of the person concerned, voluntariness and preliminary nature of consent, its clear expression). The author, among other things, emphasizes the need for legislative regulation (in the format of a multi-factor approach) of the temporal aspect of conciliation procedure; indicates the relevance of applying the rule of giving medical clarifications in the situation of a request for termination of medical intervention; justifies the expediency of considering the sign of an obvious expression of consent, first of all, from the position of the form of expression of consent and in the content-organizational plan.

About the authors

Yu. S. Povarov

Department of Civil and Business Law, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Romanovsky G. B. Pravovoe regulirovanie meditsinskikh innovatsionnykh tekhnologii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy [Legal regulation of innovative medical technologies in the Russian Federation: problems and prospects]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justitia], 2016, no. 10, pp. 59–62. Available at: http:// lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2016/rossijskaja-justicija/10 [in Russian].
  2. Bogdanova E. E. Zashchita interesov grazhdan pri konflikte ikh lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav [Protection of Interests of Citizens in Case of Confl ict of their Personal Nonproperty Rights]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2013, no. 12, pp. 75–86. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21063276 [in Russian].
  3. Elina N. K. Pravovye problemy okazaniya meditsinskikh uslug [Legal problems of medical services]. Samara: OOO «Ofort», 2006, 195 p. [in Russian].
  4. Lukomskaya A. S. K voprosu o gosudarstvennoi genomnoi registratsii [On the issue of state genomic registration]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of the Orenburg State University], 2012, no. 3, pp. 92–94. Available at: http://vestnik.osu. ru/2012_3/20.pdf [in Russian].
  5. Sedova N. N., Solomatina E. V. Pravovaya kontseptsiya informirovannogo soglasiya: dostizheniya i poteri [Legal conception of the informed consent: achievements and losses]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical Law], 2015, no. 2, pp. 6–11. Available at: http://lawinfo. ru.swtest.ru/catalog/contents-2015/medicinskoe-pravo/2 [in Russian].
  6. Garipova I. I. Dobrovol’noe soglasie grazhdan na meditsinskoe vmeshatel’stvo v aspekte grazhdanskopravovoi deistvitel’nosti [Voluntary Consent of Citizens to Medical Intervention in the Civil Law Reality Aspect]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical Law], 2016, no. 2, pp. 39– 44. Available at: http://lawinfo.ru/catalog/contents-2016/ medicinskoe-pravo/2 [in Russian].
  7. Noack Thorsten. Eingriffe in das Selbstbestimmungsrecht des Patienten. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag-Mabuse, 2004, 238 p. [in German].
  8. Romanovskii G. B. Konstitutsionnaya pravosub”ektnost’ grazhdan v usloviyakh genomnoy meditsiny [Constitutional Status of Citizens in the Context of Genomic Medicine]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], 2017, Issue 37, pp. 260–271. doi: 10.17072/1995-4190- 2017-37-260-271 [in Russian].
  9. Dolinskaya L. M. Soglasie na meditsinskoe vmeshatel’stvo [Acceptance of Medical Intrusion]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2015, no. 1, pp. 39–43. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23235370 [in Russian].
  10. Arslanov K. M. Vrachebnaya obyazannost' po svoyevremennomu informirovaniyu patsiyenta o meditsinskom vmeshatel'stve (opyt germanskogo prava) [Doctor’s Obligation on Timely Information of Patient on Medical Intervention (German Law Experience)]. Meditsinskoe pravo [Medical Law], 2016, no. 4, pp. 50–55. Available at: http://lawinfo.ru.swtest.ru/catalog/ contents-2016/medicinskoe-pravo/4 [in Russian].
  11. Sidorova T. A., Zhichina E. Yu. Bioeticheskoe soderzhanie informirovannogo dobrovol’nogo soglasiya [Bioethical content of informed voluntary consent]. Meditsinskoe pravo: teoriya i praktika [Medical law: theory and practice]. M.: Natsional’nyi institut meditsinskogo prava, 2016, Vol. 2, no. 1 (3), pp. 239–244. Available at: http://www.med-law.ru/fi les/348/2016-1-3tom-2.pdf [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Povarov Y.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies