MAIN SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THEIR HIERARCHICAL RELATIONSHIP (PART 2)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The question of the sources of international law, which of them are the most important and the hierarchical relationship between them is not one of the most important, but at the same time the «eternal problem» of science and practice of international law. The answer determines the attitude to other (specific) problems. In addition, this category is changeless, it is in constant development, which means that it is necessary to return to it from time to time and consider it in the light of new events and relationships. For this reason, the author of the article chose this particular topic, trying to reveal it in a slightly different way than is customary in legal literature. A special intention was to point out the relativity of classifications and conclusions, as well as the growing role of decisions of international organizations. There was also a desire to provoke a scientific debate about the issues raised. The article consists of three parts. The first provides a brief overview of the sources of international law, and the author, unlike the generally accepted approach, distinguishes between the main and most important sources of international law. The second part deals with the problem of importance and interrelation of the most important sources of international law - international treaties, international legal customs and decisions of international organizations. In the third and final part, the author points to the identified problems. He particularly emphasizes the fact that in international law there is no rigid hierarchy between the norms of the most important sources of this right, as well as the fact that in the future, due to the irrepressible processes of globalization, we can expect an increase in the role of decisions of international organizations.

About the authors

B. Krivocapich

Faculty of Business and Law, University «Union – Nikola Tesla», Department of theory and history of state and law and international law, Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Serbia

References

  1. Krivokapič Boris (2017) Miagkoe pravo v mezhdunarodnom prave [Mild law in international law]. In: Lutovac Mitar (ed.): International Conference: «Composite Materials, Ecology, Information Technology, Economics and Law», Tivat: ELaSa, 2017 [in English].
  2. Hartley T.C. (2010), Barchardt Klaus-Dieter (2010). Moorhead Timothy (2012), pp. 125–144 [in English].
  3. Öberg Marko. The Legal Effects of Resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence of the ICJ. European Journal of International Law, 2006, Vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 879–906 [in English].
  4. Rezoliutsii 1348/1958, 1472/1959, 1721/1961, 1802/1962, 1962/1963 i dr. [Resolutions 1348/1958, 1472/1959, 1721/1961, 1802/1962, 1962/1963 and others] [in Russian].
  5. Krivokapić Boris. NATO Aggression on Yugoslavia as an Assault of International Law. International Law and Interventionism in the New World Order: From Iraq to Yugoslavia. Madrid, 2007, pp. 207–240 [in English].
  6. Cassese Antonio. Ex injuria jus oritur: Are We Moving Towards International Legitimation of Forced Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community? European Journal of International Law, 1999, no. 1, pp. 23–30 [in English].
  7. Krivokapić Boris. Актуелни проблеми међународного права [Current Problems of International Law]. Belgrade, 2011 [in Serbian].
  8. Resolution 181 (II) Future government of Palestine, 29 November 1947, in particular Part III: City of Jerusalem. Available at: www.un.org/en/ga/ search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/181 (II) (accessed 11.11.2017) [in English].
  9. Rezoliutsiia Soveta Bezopasnosti OON № 2372 (2017), kasaiushchuiusia missii Afrikanskogo soiuza v Somali (AMISOM) [Resolution of the Security Council of UN No. 2372 (2017), concerning the missions of the African Union in Somalia (AMISOM). Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc. asp?symbol=S/RES/2372(2017) (accessed 11.11.2017) [in English].
  10. Krivokapić Boris. Санкције у међународном праву [Sanctions in International Law]. Правни живот [Legal Life], 2013, no. 12, pp. 125–140 [in Serbian].
  11. Krivokapić Boris. Међународно јавно право [International Public Law]. Belgrade, 2017 [in Serbian].
  12. Al-Qaysi Riyadh. The Legal and Humanitarian Actions of the United Nations Against Iraq in the Gulf War. International Law and Interventionism in the «New World Order». Madrid, 2000, pp. 23–100 [in English]
  13. Calamita Jansen N. Sanctions, Countermeasures and the Iranian Nuclear Case. Virginia Journal of Transnational Law, 2009, no. 5, pp. 1393–1442 [in English].
  14. Abass Ademola, White Nigel. Countermeasures and Sanctions. International Law. Malcolm D. Evans (ed.). Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 531–558 [in English].
  15. Culvahouse Arthur B. A practical guide to international sanctions law and lore: mamas, do not let your children grow up to be sanctions lawyers. Houston Journal of International Law, 2010, no. 3, pp. 587–604 [in English].
  16. Hellquist Elin (2014) European Union restrictive measures (senes) in force. Available at: https://eeas. europa.eu/sites/eeas/fi les/restrictive_measures-2017-0117-clean.pdf (accessed 11.11.2017) [in English].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Krivocapich B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies