CONTRADICTORY JUDICIAL ACTS IN THE ARBITRATION PROCESS: PROBLEMS OF QUALIFICATION
- Authors: Popova N.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Department of Social Technologies and Law, Samara State Transport University
- Issue: Vol 4, No 4 (2018)
- Pages: 123-127
- Section: Arbitration proceedings
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/6474
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2018-4-4-123-127
- ID: 6474
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The procedural law uses the term “confl icting judicial acts” (Article 130 of the APC of the Russian Federation) in order to counteract the adoption of decisions by various arbitration courts that would compete with each other. However, this concept is not disclosed by law, in this connection, should be developed signs and criteria of acts in respect of which it would be possible to establish their contradictory nature. The qualification acts as contradictory involves an appeal to reasons for the adoption of competing solutions. Also, conflicting judicial acts are considered by the law through the prism of overcoming the risk of their adoption. The author analyzes the content and stages of the corresponding risk. Significant features of the qualification of judicial acts as contradicting each other are the interrelated nature of the cases, the time period of the existence of acts, the unevenness in the consideration of related cases. The author qualifies a sign of inconsistency of judicial acts as an external, formal sign, because even the corresponding judicial acts do not mean the acts are legal and justified.
About the authors
N. I. Popova
Department of Social Technologies and Law, Samara State Transport University
Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Spravochno-pravovaia sistema «Konsul’tantPlius» [Legal-reference system «ConsultantPlus»] [in Russian].
- Dal’V. I. Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo iazyka: v 4 t. T. 3 [Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language: v 4 vols. Vol. 3]. M.: Russkii iaz. Media, 2007, 555 p. [in Russian].
- Ushakov D. N. Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo iazyka [Big explanatory dictionary of modern Russian language]. M.: Al’ta-Print, 2007, 1239 p. [in Russian].
- Abova T. E. Izbrannye trudy. Grazhdanskii i arbitrazhnyi protsess. Grazhdanskoe i khoziaistvennoe pravo [Selected works. Civil and arbitration proceedings. Civil and commercial law]. M.: Statut, 2007, 1134 p. [in Russian].
- Terekhov V. V. Granitsy zakonnoi sily sudebnogo resheniia: territorial’nyi i temporal’nyi aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Boundaries of the legal force of the judgment: territorial and temporal aspects: author’s abstract of Candidate’s of Legal Sciences thesis]. Ekaterinburg, 2014, 35 p. [in Russian].
- Solovykh S. Zh. Obespechenie sub”ektivnykh protsessual’nykh prav uchastnikov arbitrazhnogo protsessa: teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt: monografiia [Ensuring the subjective procedural rights of participants in the arbitration process: theoretical and methodological aspect: monograph]. M.: Iurlitinform, 2014, 392 p. [in Russian].
- Oygenzikht V. A. Problema riska v grazhdanskom prave (chast’ obshchaia) [The problem of risk in civil law (part General)]. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1972, 225 p. [in Russian].
- Aryamov A. A. Obshchaia teoriia riska (iuridicheskii, ekonomicheskii i psikhologicheskii analiz): monografiia [General theory of risk (legal, economic and psychological analysis): monograph]. M.: Rossiiskaia akademiia pravosudiia, 2009, 172 p. [in Russian].
- Reshetnikova I. V. Teoriia protsessual’nogo riska [Theory of procedural risk]. Zakon, 2012, no. 6, pp. 117– 122 [in Russian].
- Tikhomirov Yu. A. Pravovye riski [Legal risks]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2012, no. 2, pp. 87–95 [in Russian].
- Yudin A. V. Kategoriia “risk” v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Category of “risk” in civil proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Herald of Civil Procedure], 2014, no. 5, pp. 11–53 [in Russian].
Supplementary files
