ON THE POSSIBILITY OF TRANSFERRING SOME OF THE CONSUMER’S RIGHTS TO THE BUSINESS ENTITY ON THE BASIS OF THE CONTRACT OF ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS (CESSION)


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

At the heart of this paper lies collecting of debts as a new type of business activity including collecting of consumer penalties. In this article the possibility of assignment of some consumer’s rights to an entrepreneur under the contract of assignment of rights is discussed. Author’s research concerns the doctrinal facets of assignment of money debts. Particularly the analysis of contract and positive penalty as a marketable money debts is at the stake of this article. The controversial issues of transfer of right to demand payment of consumer penalty from consumer to an entrepreneur are considered here. The author proves the acceptability of transfer of any consumer right in money debt from consumer to an entrepreneur. Author’s conclusions are based on the law doctrine and judicial practice which recognise lawfulness of separate assignment of penalty debt independently from the main contract. The latest decisions of Russian Supreme Court are given in this article.

About the authors

A. A. Didenko

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 21.12.2017 № 54 «O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniia polozhenii glavy 24 GK RF o peremene lits v obiazatel'stve na osnovanii sdelki» [Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated December 21, 2017 no. 54 «On some issues of applying the provisions of Chapter 24 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the change of persons in an obligation on the basis of a transaction»]. Rossiiskaia gazeta [Rossiyskaya gazeta], 2017, December 29, no. 297 [in Russian].
  2. Didenko A. A. O deistvitel'nosti dogovora ustupki prava trebovaniia neustoiki za prosrochku peredachi ob''ekta dolevogo stroitel'stva [On the validity of the contract of assignment of the right to claim a penalty for delay in the transfer of the object of shared construction]. Vlast' Zakona [The Reign of Law], 2016, no. 4, pp. 81–92. Available at: http://niiapsp.ru/ upload/28.pdf [in Russian].
  3. Leskova Yu. G. Sposoby zashchity prav i interesov dolzhnika v dogovornykh obiazatel'stvakh [Ways to protect the rights and interests of the debtor in contractual obligations]. Vlast' Zakona [The Reign of Law], 2017, no. 1, pp. 47–55. Available at: http://niiapsp. ru/upload/29.pdf [in Russian].
  4. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraia ot 29.11.2018 po delu A32-25581/2018 [Decision of the Arbitration Court of Krasnodar Territory as of 29.11.2018 with regard to case A32-25581/2018]. Available at: kad.arbitr.ru [in Russian].
  5. Postanovleniia 15 AAS ot 26.11.2018 po delu A32-5138/2018, A32-48398/2017; Postanovleniia AS SKO ot 29.08.2018, ot 05.09.2018 i ot 20.09.2018 po delam № A32-37238/2017, № A32-31102/2017 i № A32-25441/2017 [Resolutions of the 15th AAC as of 26.11.2018 with regard to case A32-5138/2018, A32-48398/2017; Decisions of the AU SKO as of 29.08.2018, as of 05.09.2018 and as of 20.09.2018 with regard to cases № А32-37238/2017, № A32-31102/2017 and № A32-25441/2017]. Available at: kad.arbitr.ru [in Russian].
  6. Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraia ot 15.08.2018 po delu A32-5138/2018 [Decision of the Arbitration Court of the Krasnodar Territory as of 15.08.2018 with regard to case A32-5138/2018]. Available at: kad.arbitr.ru [in Russian].
  7. Ruzanova V. D. Osobennosti grazhdansko-pravovogo statusa sub’’ektov predprinimatelskikh obiazatelstv v GK i v Kontseptsii razvitiia grazhdanskogo zakonodatelstva [Civil law status of entrepreneurial relations subjects: peculiarities based on the Civil code of the Russian Federation and on the Concept of civil legislation development]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2012, no. 2, pp. 50–54. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=17748042 [in Russian].
  8. Ruzanova V. D. Osnovnye tendentsii modernizatsii sovremennogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatelstva cherez prizmu problemy obespecheniia soglasovannosti pravovogo regulirovaniia [Main tendencies of modernization of modern civil legislation through the prism of the problem of ensuring the consistency of legal regulation]. Vlast' Zakona [The Reign of Law], 2015, no. 4, pp. 79–89 [in Russian].
  9. Ruzanova V. D. Sistemnost’ grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva kak neobkhodimoe uslovie naibolee polnogо osushchestvleniia grazhdanskikh prav v predprinimatel’skoi sfere [Systeness of civil law as a necessary condition for full implementing the civil rights in the business area]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika [Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice], 2015, no. 11, pp. 15–20. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25001373 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Didenko A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies