LEGAL NATURE AND THE BASIS OF THE DECISION GUILTY VERDICT WITHOUT THE IMPOSITION OF PUNISHMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Criminal procedure law, depending on the attitude towards punishment, provides for three types of conviction. At the same time, the law does not contain an exhaustive list of grounds for the resolution of each of them. The grounds for the decision of the conviction without the appointment of punishment in the law are not given at all. The study of judicial practice shows that sentences of this kind are decided by courts. In this connection, it seems important to investigate the nature and grounds of the resolution of one of the important final judgments.

About the authors

I. P. Popova

Department of Criminal Law, Criminology and Criminal Process, Law Institute, Baikal State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Lublinsky P.I. Protsess, kak sudebnyi poriadok i protsess, kak pravootnoshenie [Process, like a judicial order and process, as legal
  2. relationship]. Zhurnal Ministerstva iustitsii [Journal of the Ministry of Justice], 1917, no. 1, pp. 237–[in Russian].
  3. Mikhailovsky I.V. Osnovnye printsipy organizatsii ugolovnogo suda. Ugolovno-politicheskoe issledovanie [Basic principles of the organization of criminal court. Criminally-political research]. Tomsk: tipo-lit. P.I. Makushina, 1905, 335 p. [in Russian].
  4. Lupinskaya P.A. Resheniia v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriia, zakonodatel’stvo, praktika: monografiia. 3-e izd., stereotip. [Decisions in criminal proceedings: theory, legislation, practice: monograph. 3rd edition, stereotyped]. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2015, 240 p. [in Russian].
  5. Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiia prava [Philosophy of Law]. М.: Izdatel’skaia gruppa Norma–Infra-M, 1998, 652 p. [in Russian].
  6. Beccaria Ch. O prestupleniiakh i nakazaniiakh. Sost. i predisl. V.S. Ovchinskogo [About crimes and punishments. Complier and preface by V.S. Ovchinsky]. М.: INFRA-М, 2011, 184 p. [in Russian].
  7. Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. V 2-kh t. T. II. Poriadok proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam po sovetskomu ugolovno-protsessual’nomu pravu [Course of Soviet criminal process. In 2 Vols. Vol. II. Procedure for Proceeding in Criminal Cases under Soviet Criminal Procedural Law]. М.: Nauka, 1970, 516 p. [in Russian].
  8. Zhogoleva E.V. Izmenenie obstanovki pri proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Change of conditions in the production of criminal proceedings: Candidate’s of Law thesis]. Ekaterinburg, 2006, 188 p. [in Russian].
  9. Zvecharovsky I. Postanovlenie obvinitel’nogo prigovora bez naznacheniia nakazaniia (st. 92 UK RF) [Resolution of the conviction without the appointment of punishment (Article 92 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law], 2016, no. 2, pp. 35–39 [in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Popova I.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies