АНАЛИЗ ПРАКТИКИ ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ СУДАМИ УГОЛОВНЫХ ДЕЛ  ПО СТАТЬЕ 25 УПК РФ

ANALYSIS OF THE PRACTICE OF CRIMINAL CASE DISMISSAL UNDER THE ARTICLE 25 OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CODEOF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Cite item

This article analyzes the practice of dismissal of criminal cases

in connection with the reconciliation of the parties (Article 25 of

the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure) in federal

district and municipal courts of the Samara region. The author

observed that the dismissal of criminal cases in connection with

the reconciliation of the parties is placed in more dependency on

additional, not provided by law conditions – specific circumstances

of the crime, data on the identity of the defendant, extenuating

circumstances. At the same time determination of similar additional

conditions in the case permits some judges to dismiss a criminal

case, and the other – to refuse dismissal. The author has tried to

examine the reasons for the lack of uniformity in the judicial

practice of criminal cases dismissal in connection with the

reconciliation of the parties.

Samara National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru

Mironenkova A. Zakonnost’, tselesoobraznost’ i diskretsionnost’ v ugolovnom protsesse
[Legitimacy, expediency and discretionary nature in the criminal process]. Mirovoi sud’ia
[Magistrate judge]. No. 10. P. 11–13 [in Russian].
Golovko L.V. Al’ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniiu v sovremennom prave [Alternatives
to the criminal prosecution in modern right]. M., 544 p. [in Russian].
Shamardin A.A. K voprosu o soderzhanii dispozitivnosti v ugolovno-protsessual’nom prave
[On the issue of the content of dispositivity in criminally-remedial law]. Vestnik OGU [Vestnik of
Orenburg State University]. No. 3. P. 60–64 [in Russian].

Supplementary Files

Action

1. JATS XML