PLEA OF GUILTY AS A BASIS FOR THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTERS 32.1,40, 40.1 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
- Authors: Lazareva V.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 2, No 1 (2016)
- Pages: 118-127
- Section: Criminal procedure
- URL: https://journals.ssau.ru/jjsu/article/view/4982
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2016-2-1-118-127
- ID: 4982
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article concerns problems of realization of the principle
of presumption of innocence within the procedures based on
confession of guilt of the accused (provided in Chapters 40 and
40.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation),
and we come to the conclusion about inadmissibility of overvalue
of a role of confession of guilt at criminal sentencing on such
cases and need of improvement of the legislation in this area.
About the authors
V. A. Lazareva
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: morenovsv@ssau.ru
References
- Novikov S.A. Pokazaniia obviniaemogo v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii
- [Testimony of the defendant in the modern criminal process of Russia]. SPb.: Izd.Dom S.-Peterb.
- gos. un-ta, [in Russian].
- Kasatkina S.A. Priznanie obviniaemogo: monografiia [Confession of the accused. Monograph].
- M.: Prospekt, [in Russian].
- Kiryanov A.Yu. Prezumptsiia nevinovnosti v sovremennom ugolovnom protsesse Rossii i
- aktual’nye problemy ee realizatsii [Presumption of innocence in modern criminal process of Russia
- and actual problems of its implementation]. Samara, [in Russian].
- Boikov A.D. Tret’ia vlast’ v Rossii. Kniga vtoraia – prodolzhenie reform [Third power in Russia. The second book – continuation of reforms]. M.: Iurlitinform, 2002 [in Russian].
- Bykov V., Gromov N. Osobyi poriadok priniatiia sudebnogo resheniia pri soglasii obviniaemogo s pred,
- iavlennym emu obvineniem [Special procedure for adoption of court decision
- with the consent of the accused with the charges against him]. Ugolovnoe pravo [Criminal Law],
- , no. 2, pp. 92–[in Russian].
- Pobedkin A.V. Nekotorye voprosy sobiraniia dokazatel’stv po novomu ugolovnoprotsessual’nomu
- zakonodatel’stvu Rossii [Some issues of the collection of evidence under new
- criminal procedural legislation of Russia]. Gosudarstvo i pravo [State and Law], 2003, no. [in Russian].
- Zakotyanski A.S. Problemy ispol’zovaniia neprotsessual’noi informatsii v dokazyvanii po
- ugolovnym delam [Problems of using non-procedural information in averment on criminal cases].
- M.: Iurlitinform, [in Russian].
- Lazarevа V.A. Nuzhny li takie izmeneniia v protsedure doznaniia? [Do we need such changes
- in the procedure of inquiry?]. Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal process], 2012, no. [in Russian].
- Lazarevа V.A. Doznanie v sokrashchennoi forme: voprosy dokazyvaniia [Inquiry in the
- abbreviated form: evidential matters]. Gosudarstvo i pravo: voprosy metodologii, teorii i praktiki
- funktsionirovaniia. Sb. nauchnykh trudov. Vyp. [State and law: issues of methodology, theory and
- practice of functioning. Collection of research papers. Issue 3]. Samara: Izd-vo Samarskii universitet, [in Russian].
- Lazarevа V.A., Sheifer S.A. Dokazatel’stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnomu delu v svete FZ
- №ot 04.03.2013 [Proof and proving in a criminal case in the light of the Federal Law № 23 dated 04.03.2013]. NZh Biblioteka kriminalista [The Criminalist’s Library Scientific Journal], 2014, no. 6, pp. 375–382 [in Russian].
- Kasatkina S.A. Priznanie viny: monografiia [Admission of guilt. Monograph]. M.: Prospekt, 2010 [in Russian].
- Kuvaldinа Yu.V. Predposylki i perspektivy razvitiia kompromissnykh sposobov razresheniia ugolovno-pravovykh konfliktov v Rossii. Diss. kand.iurid.nauk [Preconditions and prospects of development of compromise ways of resolving criminal and legal conflicts in Russia. Candidate’s of Law thesis]. Samara, 2011, pp. 146–148 [in Russian].
- Burchakova M.S., Shamardin A.A. K voprosu o pravovoi prirode osobogo poriadka sudebnogo razbiratel’stva i problemakh ego sovershenstvovaniia [On the issue of the legal nature of special proceedings and the problems of its improving]. Rossiiskii sud’ia [Russian judge], 2005, no. 10,
- pp. 13–[in Russian].
Supplementary files
