Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philologyVestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology2542-04452712-8946Samara National Research University870810.18287/2542-0445-2021-27-2-139-145UnknownINSTITUTIONALITY OF EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALIZATIONGoncharovaM. A.<p>Candidate of Philological Sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the Department of German Philology</p>mgontcharova@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4361-6318NikitinV. N.<p>associate professor of the Department of German Philology</p>niva@ssau.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-9199Samara National Research University060820212721391451205202112052021Copyright © 2021, Goncharova M.A., Nikitin V.N.2021<p>The article features a comparative analysis of the traditional pedagogical and modern educational discourse. The central aspect of this comparison is the institutional factor in the context of digitalization. Pedagogical discourse traditionally belongs to institutional types of discourse where participants act within the framework of certain social roles: the teacher transfers knowledge and norms of social behavior to the student. In modern educational discourse we are talking about the transfer of information. The authors consider the following forms of modern educational discourse: the use of digital media in classrooms, online courses with tutors, online courses with trainers, educational accounts on social networks, online classes in zoom interactive program. The study revealed that in the first case, digitalization does not affect the degree of institutionalization. Online courses with tutors, which are characterized by a rather rigid structure and clearly defined functions of tutors, demonstrate higher degree of institutionalization compared to traditional pedagogical discourse. In other cases, digitalization has led to a lower degree of institutionalization: learning using Internet technologies is generally more personalized, participants use rather informal language, use smiles and emojis to express their emotions. The authors believe that this trend will remain, since the emotional component is an important factor in maintaining motivation to learn.</p>discourseeducational discoursepedagogical discourselearning discoursedigitalizationdigital connectioncontinuing educationlifelong learning, internet discoursezoom interactive programonline lecturelive programblogpostforum.дискурсобразовательный дискурспедагогический дискурсучебный дискурсдигитализацияцифровизациянепрерывное образованиеинтернет-дискурсинтерактивная программа Zoomонлайн-лекцияпрямой эфирблогпостфорум.[Grein – Grein M. Sprachunterricht auf einmal digital: Online-Lernen vor, während und nach Corona. Available at: https://www.goethe.de/ins/kr/de/spr/mag/21927962.html (accessed 30.12.2020).][Krommer – Krommer A. Authentische Kommunikation in digitalen Medien. Available at: https://www.goethe.de/ins/kr/de/spr/mag/21180151.html (accessed 30.12.2020).][Volynkina, Kuzina 2016 – Volynkina S.V., Kuzina E.N. (2016) The repertoire of genres of scientific-pedagogical discourse. The bulletin of KSPU named after V.P. Astafiev, no. 2, pp. 144–147. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26209989. (In Russ.)][Goncharova 2016 – Goncharova M.A. (2016) Transformation of the «culinary recipe» text type in the Internet discourse. In: Evolution and transformation of discourses: proceedings of the conference. Samara: Samarskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, no. 1, pp. 294–303. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27308465; http://repo.ssau.ru/bitstream/EVOLUCIYa-I-TRANSFORMACIYa-DISKURSOV/Transformaciya-tipa-teksta-«kulinarnyi-recept»-v-Internetdiskurse-72028/1/ilovepdf_com-294-303.pdf. (In Russ.)][Evtyugina 2014 – Evtyugina A.A. (2014) Scientific and pedagogical discourse as a type of institutional communication in the educational environment of a pedagogical higher educational establishment. Nauchnyi dialog = Scientific Dialogue, no. 3 (27), pp. 141–153. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21398686. (In Russ.)][Karasik 1998 – Karasik V.I. (1998) On the categories of discourse. In: Linguistic personality: sociolinguistic and emotive aspects: collection of scientific works. Volgograd – Saratov: Peremena, pp. 185–197. Available at: http://homepages.tversu.ru/~ips/JubKaras.html; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25977195. (In Russ.)][Karasik 2002 – Karasik V.I. (2002) Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse. Volgograd: Peremena, 477 p. Available at: https://docplayer.ru/28188986-Yazykovoy-krug-lichnost-koncepty-diskurs.html. (In Russ.)][Kozheteva 2012 – Kozheteva A.S. (2012) Diplomatic discourse as a special kind of institutional discourse. Scientific Journal of Voronezh State Technical University. Modern Linguistic & Methodical-and-didactic Researches, no. 17, pp. 54–63. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17706982. (In Russ.)][Lysenko 2016 – Lysenko A.I. (2016) The concept «creativity» in Russian scientific-educational discourse. International Scientific Review, no. 8 (18), pp. 58–60. Available at: https://scientific-conference.com/images/PDF/2016/18/International-scientific-review-8-18.pdf; https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26190749. (In Russ.)][Myakisheva, Tabanakova 2012 – Myakisheva I.A., Tabanakova V.D. (2012) Generic definitional model of linguistic term in scientific learning discourse. Tyumen State University Herald, no. 1, pp. 130–135. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19057097&. (In English; original in Russ.)][Polonnikov, Kalachikova, Korol, Korchalova 2016 – Polonnikov A.A., Kalachikova O.N., Korol D.Yu., Korchalova N.D. (2016) Text centered educational discourse in the mirror of contemporary visual culture. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, no. 10, pp. 48–61. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27170217. (In Russ.)][Popova 2015 – Popova D.A. (2015) Ways of the Internet discourse subject representation on the interpersonal level of communication in the comment genre. Evolution and transformation of discourses: linguistic and sociocultural aspects: collection of scientific articles. Samara: Izd-vo «Samarskii universitet», pp. 46–52. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23998412. (In Russ.)][Serebrennikova 2012 – Serebrennikova E.F. (2012) Foundations of the vector analysis to semiotics modeling of Internet-space. The ISLU Philologicaal Review, no. 1 (17), pp. 20–27. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17657243. (In Russ.)][Yakhibbaeva 2008 – Yakhibbaeva L.M. (2008) Educational text as a special type of secondary text and a component of educational discourse. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Bashkir University, no. 4, pp. 1029–1031. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12418722. (In Russ.)]