PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONCERNING RENDERING MEDICAL SERVICE


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The implementation of the constitutional rights of citizens declared by Article 41, rests on the problems associated with the judicial proceedings on the provision of medical services. In 2007, the report on the grant of the American Association of Justice has already given arguments for and against, inflamed discussions, which then cover Europe and other states. However, in the domestic literature we find only comments and research on this issue. It is necessary to create mechanisms that are not burdened with contradictions between law and bioethics, in the process of protecting medical organizations and doctors in conflicts with insurance organizations and patients about the provision of medical services. The article analyzes the provisions of international law and practical experience; the provisions of the current Russian legislation on mediation and arbitration; the experience of the NMP. The authors propose an algorithm that allows to discuss, propose and resolve complex conflicts from the point of view of medical law and under the condition of bioethical approach. It should be emphasized that there is a need for discussion on the consideration of disputes between patients and doctors about the provision of medical services in specialized medical courts.

About the authors

V. А. Kupryakhin

Department of Medical Law and Bioethics, Samara State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

Е. А. Shvetsova

Department of Medical Law and Bioethics, Samara State Medical University

Email: grigorjewa.katerina@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Philip K. Howard, Rebecca G. Maine. Health courts may be best cure for what ails the liability system. Available at: http://bulletin.facs.org/2013/03/healthcourts-best-cure/#printpreview (accessed 10.09.2018) [in English].
  2. Philip K. Howard. Special Health Courts: The Cure for Defensive Medicine. The Atlantic, February 24, 2010. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/02/special-health-courts-the-cure-fordefensive-medicine/36564 (accessed 10.09.2018) [in English].
  3. Roshal L. M. Leonid Roshal’: nasha tsel’ – sdelat’ tak, chtoby v Rossii bylo bol’she kachestvennykh vrachei [Leonid Roshal: Our goal is to make sure that there are more quality doctors in Russia]. Moskovskaia meditsina [Moscow medicine], 2015, no. 2 (5), pp. 11–15. Available at: https://mosgorzdrav.ru/ru-RU/journal/default/card/25.html [in Russian].
  4. Philip G., Peters Jr. Health Courts?Boston University Law Review, 2008. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/bulr/documents/peters.pdf 10.09.2018) [in English].
  5. Tikhomirov A.V. Meditsinskie sudy [Medical courts]. Glavnyi vrach: khoziaistvo i pravo [Head Doctor: Economy and Law], 2015, no. 2, pp. 33–39 [in Russian].
  6. Joel E. Chodos. Should there be specialty courts for medical malpractice litigation?. Available at: https:// medicalreview.columbia.edu/article/specialty-courts-2 (accessed 11.09.2018) [in English].
  7. Kupryakhin V. A., Sadovski V. V., Sergeev V. V. Treteiskii sud. Razreshenie sporov, sviazannykh s okazaniem stomatologicheskikh uslug [Arbitration court. Settlement of disputes, related to rendering of stomatological services]. Problemy stomatologii [Actual problems in dentistry], 2017, Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-
  8. -2017-13-2-95-[in Russian].

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Kupryakhin V.А., Shvetsova Е.А.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies